2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06982-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep learning analysis using FDG-PET to predict treatment outcome in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The majority of these studies used a convolutional neural network (CNN) [ 2 , 15 – 22 , 24 26 , 28 , 31 36 , 38 41 , 43 45 , 48 , 49 ]. Several data types such as gene expression data [ 15 , 45 ], spectra data [ 20 , 21 , 29 , 34 , 37 , 44 , 48 ], and other image data types—anatomical [ 16 ], intraoral [ 17 ], histology [ 18 , 27 ], auto-fluorescence [ 19 , 22 ], cytology-image [ 23 ], neoplastic [ 40 ], clinical [ 28 , 36 , 38 ], oral lesions [ 42 ], computed tomography images [ 24 26 , 33 , 35 , 41 , 49 ], clinicopathologic [ 2 ], saliva metabolites [ 31 ], histopathological [ 30 , 32 , 43 ], and pathological [ 39 ] images have been used in the included studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The majority of these studies used a convolutional neural network (CNN) [ 2 , 15 – 22 , 24 26 , 28 , 31 36 , 38 41 , 43 45 , 48 , 49 ]. Several data types such as gene expression data [ 15 , 45 ], spectra data [ 20 , 21 , 29 , 34 , 37 , 44 , 48 ], and other image data types—anatomical [ 16 ], intraoral [ 17 ], histology [ 18 , 27 ], auto-fluorescence [ 19 , 22 ], cytology-image [ 23 ], neoplastic [ 40 ], clinical [ 28 , 36 , 38 ], oral lesions [ 42 ], computed tomography images [ 24 26 , 33 , 35 , 41 , 49 ], clinicopathologic [ 2 ], saliva metabolites [ 31 ], histopathological [ 30 , 32 , 43 ], and pathological [ 39 ] images have been used in the included studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single study reported the performance of deep learning with four different performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under receiving operating characteristics curve [AUC]) [ 16 ]. Similarly, a total of 11 studies reported the combination of the trio of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy as the performance metrics for the deep machine learning method [ 15 , 19 21 , 24 , 25 , 30 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 42 ]. Both specificity and sensitivity were used to depict the performance of the model [ 17 , 20 , 22 , 27 , 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a potential of high diagnostic performance in the deep learning model and its independence from the HPV status might be indicated by results from the subgroup analysis in the current study, further analyses with the division of total patients into homogeneous treatment regimens and positive/negative HPV status are needed to address these limitations. In addition, the previous investigation described the diagnostic model to predict the HPV status from deep learning-based image analysis using FDG-PET images [ 14 ]. The integrated use, including this previously described model, might contribute more accurate diagnosis in deep learning-based local prognosis prediction as a future analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep learning-based medical image analysis enables identifying features and textures inherent in the original images; the deep learning technique has a potential to accomplish the image analysis with high diagnostic performance [ 12 ]. However, few studies investigated the usefulness of deep learning analysis in head and neck cancer imaging to predict local treatment outcomes [ 13 , 14 ]. To our knowledge, there is no previous study to predict the local treatment outcome of OPSCCs by deep learning techniques using the FDG-PET imaging dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several data types such as pathologic and radiographic images have been used by deep learning in the quest to achieve precise diagnosis and prognosis [20,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Other data types include gene expression data, spectra data, saliva metabolites, autofluorescence, cytology-image, computed tomography images, and clinicopathologic images that have been used in the deep learning analysis for improved diagnosis of oral cancer [7].…”
Section: Data Used In Deep Learning Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%