2012
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep intronicAPCmutations explain a substantial proportion of patients with familial or early-onset adenomatous polyposis

Abstract: To uncover pathogenic deep intronic variants in patients with colorectal adenomatous polyposis, in whom no germline mutation in the APC or MUTYH genes can be identified by routine diagnostics, we performed a systematic APC messenger RNA analysis in 125 unrelated mutation-negative cases. Overall, we identified aberrant transcripts in 8% of the patients (familial cases 30%; early-onset manifestation 21%). In eight of them, two different out-of-frame pseudoexons were found consisting of a 167-bp insertion from in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was noticeable that exons pertaining to CCDS transcripts were better covered than those that did not (Table 1). Finally, mutations outside protein-coding exons, or not in exons at all, might also affect the actual exome (the parts covered or not covered by WES) because mutations in the middle of long introns might impair the normal splicing of exons (37). These mutations would be missed by WES but would be picked up by WGS (and selected as candidate mutations if the mRNAs were studied in parallel, for example by RNAseq).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noticeable that exons pertaining to CCDS transcripts were better covered than those that did not (Table 1). Finally, mutations outside protein-coding exons, or not in exons at all, might also affect the actual exome (the parts covered or not covered by WES) because mutations in the middle of long introns might impair the normal splicing of exons (37). These mutations would be missed by WES but would be picked up by WGS (and selected as candidate mutations if the mRNAs were studied in parallel, for example by RNAseq).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional related mutations have been reported in genes involved in the base excision repair system or the Wnt pathway (31)(32)(33)(34)(35). Other mechanisms, such as mosaicism and deep intronic APC gene mutations, are also reportedly associated with attenuated polyposis, and could explain a small proportion of cases (36,37). The existence of other yet unknown genes involved in cases showing multiple colonic polyps with incomplete penetrance, as well as complex interactions between environmental factors and modifier genes might further account for the unexplained cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 • In APC/MUTYH mutation-negative families, deep intronic mutations not covered by routine methods have been identified in up to 8% of unselected and up to 30% of familial cases. 7 • Post-zygotic mosaicism in 10-15% of de novo events. 8 • For the mutational spectrum, see locus-specific databases:…”
Section: Mutational Spectrummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 • Mutations deep within introns or in regulatory elements are missed with current standard methods, 7 and the causal relevance of some missense or intronic mutations is unclear, so far (variants of uncertain clinical significance, VUS).…”
Section: Clinical Sensitivity (Proportion Of Positive Tests If the DImentioning
confidence: 99%