2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01816-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-inspirational breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer: various aspects of clinical utility

Abstract: Background Studying the clinical utility of deep-inspirational breath-hold (DIBH) in left breast cancer radiotherapy (RT) was aimed at focusing on dosimetry and feasibility aspects. Methods In this prospective trial all enrolled patients went through planning CT in supine position under both DIBH and free breathing (FB); in whole breast irradiation (WBI) cases prone CT was also taken. In 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) plans heart, lef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also been reported by Gaal et al that about one-third of 130 patients in their study did not benefit from that otherwise laborious procedure. Twenty-six patients were not suitable for the technique and heart or LAD dose constraints were not met in the DIBH plans for 16 patients [ 42 ]. For evaluating the efficacy of DIBH for plan parameters improvement, 3DCRT_DIBH was significantly effective in dose reduction of normal tissues compared to the 3DCRT_FB technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has also been reported by Gaal et al that about one-third of 130 patients in their study did not benefit from that otherwise laborious procedure. Twenty-six patients were not suitable for the technique and heart or LAD dose constraints were not met in the DIBH plans for 16 patients [ 42 ]. For evaluating the efficacy of DIBH for plan parameters improvement, 3DCRT_DIBH was significantly effective in dose reduction of normal tissues compared to the 3DCRT_FB technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the trade-off between the DIBH and free breath needs to be evaluated in a clinical setting for each patient. 30 The exclusion of axillary node was the limitation of this study. Irradiation of axillary node does not improve the overall and cancer-specific survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Although DIBH reduces cardiac dose compared to free breathing in patients receiving left-breast RT with and without RNI [28], not all patients are good candidates for DIBH. The benefit provided by DIBH may be confined to specific populations, such as those with greater lung volume, higher body mass index, postmastectomy, lower quadrant breast tumors, or tumors extending across more than one quadrant [29][30][31][32]. In addition, some patients still have a worse heart and lung dose under DIBH compared with free breathing [30,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of DIBH varies individually. Furthermore, around 20-40% of patients are not suitable for or do not benefit from DIBH [30,32,34]. Thus, investigations of optimal techniques should consider situations where DIBH cannot be implement or is not feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%