2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04826-5_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Hybrid AdaBoost Ensembles for Histopathological Breast Cancer Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing works on classification are using the datasets with fewer number of sample images [1, 3, 5, 6, 17, 18, 21, 24, 28-30, 33, 34, 36, 41, 42, 47] that may not sufficient to train deep learning algorithms because training process of a deep learning network require a large amount of image data. The most frequently used datasets are the BreakHis [2,4,6,9,12,14,23,27,31,32,40,48] and the WBCD [1,5,10,17,21,34,41,42]. However, the WBCD dataset consists of only 569 or 699 instances with 32 features, while, the BreakHis dataset consists of 7909 images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existing works on classification are using the datasets with fewer number of sample images [1, 3, 5, 6, 17, 18, 21, 24, 28-30, 33, 34, 36, 41, 42, 47] that may not sufficient to train deep learning algorithms because training process of a deep learning network require a large amount of image data. The most frequently used datasets are the BreakHis [2,4,6,9,12,14,23,27,31,32,40,48] and the WBCD [1,5,10,17,21,34,41,42]. However, the WBCD dataset consists of only 569 or 699 instances with 32 features, while, the BreakHis dataset consists of 7909 images.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SELF ❼ The researchers have adopted machine learning [1,6,10,24,29] or deep learning [2,4,12,14,18,28,31,40,47,48] or ensemble learning [3, 5, 17, 20, 21, 23, 27, 30, 32-34, 36, 41, 42] techniques to address the breast cancer classification problem, and put their best efforts to improve the performance of their proposed approach(s). From Table 1, we observe that most of the existing works have mainly borrowed the deep learning techniques to address the breast cancer classification problem because of image datasets [2,4,9,12,14,18,20,23,28,31,32,40,47,47,48]. The Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), a deep learning model, performs well on image datasets because it handles the entire feature engineering phase and extracts features from an image in an efficient way.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the encouraging classification results provided by ML and DL models, the use of one classifier does not always provide the best outperforming model and the higher accuracy in all circumstances since (1) it highly depends on the type of the problem dealt with and (2) each single classifier has its advantages and weaknesses (Hosni et al, 2019). To deal with this limitation, researchers investigated the ensemble learning approach (Ahmed and El Sadig, 2019;Idri et al, 2020;Kassani et al, 2020;Nakach et al, 2022;El Ouassif et al, 2021) which consists of combining single learners that are accurate and diverse in order to consolidate their advantages and overcome their weaknesses using a combination rule such as simple majority voting or weighted voting (Kuncheva, 2003). In the medical field and more precisely for BC diagnosis classification, many studies proposed the use of ensemble learning to improve the classification performances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%