2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.14.456342
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep graph learning of inter-protein contacts

Abstract: Motivation: Inter-protein (interfacial) contact prediction is very useful for in silico structural characterization of protein-protein interactions. Although deep learning has been applied to this problem, its accuracy is not as good as intra-protein contact prediction. Results: We propose a new deep learning method GLINTER (Graph Learning of INTER-protein contacts) for interfacial contact prediction of dimers, leveraging a rotational invariant representation of protein tertiary structures and a pretrained la… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the suboptimal scenarios, the predicted interchain contacts together with the true tertiary structure of monomers in the bound state are used as input. We used two interchain contact predictors: DRCon (6Å version) to predict interchain contacts for the CASP_CAPRI homodimer dataset and Glinter (Xie and Xu 2021) for the Std_32 heterodimer dataset. In the most realistic scenario both the predicted interchain contacts and the unbound tertiary structures of monomers predicted by AlphaFold2 (Jumper et al 2021) are used as input.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the suboptimal scenarios, the predicted interchain contacts together with the true tertiary structure of monomers in the bound state are used as input. We used two interchain contact predictors: DRCon (6Å version) to predict interchain contacts for the CASP_CAPRI homodimer dataset and Glinter (Xie and Xu 2021) for the Std_32 heterodimer dataset. In the most realistic scenario both the predicted interchain contacts and the unbound tertiary structures of monomers predicted by AlphaFold2 (Jumper et al 2021) are used as input.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the notable progress in tertiary structure prediction, the prediction of quaternary structure of protein complexes is still in the early stage of development (Zeng et al 2018; J. Hou et al 2020; Quadir, Roy, Soltanikazemi, et al 2021; Quadir, Roy, Halfmann, et al 2021, 2; Yan and Huang 2021; Roy et al 2021; Xie and Xu 2021). The methods for quaternary structure prediction can be subdivided into two categories: ab-initio methods(Lyskov and Gray 2008; Pierce et al 2014; Quadir, Roy, Soltanikazemi, et al 2021; Evans et al 2021; Park et al 2021) and template-based methods(Tuncbag et al 2012; Guerler, Govindarajoo, and Zhang 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… Su et al , 2021 ; Tunyasuvunakool et al , 2021 ), which opens up new types of features to be included in DL methods for interface prediction (e.g. Dai and Bailey-Kellogg, 2021 ; Xie and Xu, 2021 ). These are really exciting developments, and e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the usefulness of predicted structures for interface prediction may be limited (e.g. Xie and Xu, 2021 ). Therefore, we aim to predict protein bindings of the mentioned interaction types at residue level, using only information related to protein sequence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%