2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1904.11376
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Generative Models for Reject Inference in Credit Scoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2018) suggested a hybrid model where credit records for customers were transferred into a pixel matrix and then used the obtained matrices to construct a convolutional neural network (CNN) in order to predict default. More recently, Mancisidor et al (2019) constructed a deep generative model (DGM) with the goal of improving the classification accuracy of credit scoring models by adding reject applications. However, mainly two deep learning architectures have been previously constructed for application scoring using a standard pre-processing setup, namely a multilayer perceptron network (MLP) and a deep belief network (DBN).…”
Section: Credit Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2018) suggested a hybrid model where credit records for customers were transferred into a pixel matrix and then used the obtained matrices to construct a convolutional neural network (CNN) in order to predict default. More recently, Mancisidor et al (2019) constructed a deep generative model (DGM) with the goal of improving the classification accuracy of credit scoring models by adding reject applications. However, mainly two deep learning architectures have been previously constructed for application scoring using a standard pre-processing setup, namely a multilayer perceptron network (MLP) and a deep belief network (DBN).…”
Section: Credit Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce this effect, we are avoiding use of credit score for small fraction of total population. It is worth noting, if this approach is too costly, model based methods can be used instead to account for this bias [8,9].…”
Section: May 13 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%