2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2018.2858752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Generative Adversarial Neural Networks for Compressive Sensing MRI

Abstract: Undersampled magnetic resonance image (MRI) reconstruction is typically an ill-posed linear inverse task. The time and resource intensive computations require trade offs between accuracy and speed. In addition, state-of-the-art compressed sensing (CS) analytics are not cognizant of the image diagnostic quality. To address these challenges, we propose a novel CS framework that uses generative adversarial networks (GAN) to model the (low-dimensional) manifold of high-quality MR images. Leveraging a mixture of le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
424
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 504 publications
(428 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
424
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in this study, we choose to minimize the scriptl2‐loss and do not fully explore other loss functions such as scriptl1‐loss or SSIM‐loss. The scriptl1‐loss function has been shown to provide superior training or improved results in image restoration, super resolution, and MR image reconstruction . Therefore, we performed preliminary tests comparing the scriptl1‐loss and scriptl2‐loss using the tGA rot trajectory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in this study, we choose to minimize the scriptl2‐loss and do not fully explore other loss functions such as scriptl1‐loss or SSIM‐loss. The scriptl1‐loss function has been shown to provide superior training or improved results in image restoration, super resolution, and MR image reconstruction . Therefore, we performed preliminary tests comparing the scriptl1‐loss and scriptl2‐loss using the tGA rot trajectory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training Off‐ResNet with a generative adversarial network could be a way to address this issue. It has been noted that generative adversarial networks can improve perceptual image quality and are better at maintaining high‐frequency structures than using only a data consistency loss . We have proposed a theoretically motivated architecture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many published techniques on undersampled image reconstruction, and image reconstruction can also be interpreted as an image artifact correction problem, suggesting feasibility for deblurring off‐resonance. Some convolutional neural network techniques operate entirely in the image domain and enhance image quality with supervised, perceptual, and adversarial losses . Still operating primarily in the image domain but drawing from a SENSE‐based reconstruction, there are techniques that use deep variational networks to learn a deep model prior to replacing the sparsity regularizers in the compressed‐sensing reconstruction equation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category is supervised learning approaches, which usually need an input‐output pair in the training stage and start from the same type of input data in the testing stage. There are roughly two types of supervised learning methods: One is data‐driven, which collects a large size of a training set to train a network that maps the observed data and ideal reconstruction purely from the perspective of end‐to‐end learning . The representative and widely used method of this kind is the convolution neural network (CNN) MRI .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main contributions of this work are as follows: To our best knowledge, this is the first work to introduce the DAE prior for MRI reconstruction. Unlike the recent deep CNN‐based methods using an end‐to‐end learning fashion, we use network learning as a tool to learn general prior information and incorporate it into the constrained reconstruction framework, whose flowchart illustration is shown in Figure . Once the network‐learned image prior is obtained, it can be applied to the reconstruction tasks with different sampling trajectories and acceleration factors, and can guarantee promising results. More important, two advanced strategies are proposed to enhance the naïve DAE prior, termed EDAEP (enhanced DAEP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%