Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2020
DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2020/349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Feedback Network for Recommendation

Abstract: Both explicit and implicit feedbacks can reflect user opinions on items, which are essential for learning user preferences in recommendation. However, most current recommendation algorithms merely focus on implicit positive feedbacks (e.g., click), ignoring other informative user behaviors. In this paper, we aim to jointly consider explicit/implicit and positive/negative feedbacks to learn user unbiased preferences for recommendation. Specifically, we propose a novel Deep feedback network (DFN) modelin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, some pioneering work (DFN [33], DSTN [25]) highlight the importance of modeling both users' positive and negative feedback for CTR prediction. Besides the clicked behaviors, there are abundant exposure data in users' historical behaviors called unclicked behaviors (i.e., items which are impressed to the user but are not clicked).…”
Section: Related Work 21 Ctr Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, some pioneering work (DFN [33], DSTN [25]) highlight the importance of modeling both users' positive and negative feedback for CTR prediction. Besides the clicked behaviors, there are abundant exposure data in users' historical behaviors called unclicked behaviors (i.e., items which are impressed to the user but are not clicked).…”
Section: Related Work 21 Ctr Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that the click sequence is essential for performance but is still insufficient because they omit the user's complete interaction history. • The methods DFN [33] and DSTN [25] are the previous stateof-the-art methods for modeling both the positive and negative feedback. They outperform YoutubeNet and DIN by modeling the click and unclick sequence separately.…”
Section: Overall Performance: Rq1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix factorization (MF) [15] and Factorization machine (FM) [18] are classical recommendation models. Recently, neural models [3,9,11,16,28,30] have been successfully verified in modeling (high-order) feature interactions. AutoInt [20] and AFN [4] further bring in self-attention and logarithmic transformation layer to capture useful feature interactions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to denote the representations of either clicked or real-time exposed items S 𝐹 𝑢 . Note that, the reason that we take the exposed items into account, is that they are also informative as pointed in [4,29]. In the fast component, we use two GRUs to separately encode the clicked parts and the exposed parts of H 𝐹 , termed as H 𝐹 𝑝 and H 𝐹 𝑛 respectively, and then fuse them by a target-aware attention mechanism.…”
Section: Independent Fast Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%