2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep facial analysis: A new phase I epilepsy evaluation using computer vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study shows that the analysis of patients considering all body motions simultaneously is viable using the existing monitoring technology in the hospital. As it was confirmed in previous studies [5,6], the performance of LOSO-CV schemes is strictly related to semiological patterns contained in the dataset. This is evident from the difference in classification performance between patients based on the deep learning architecture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our study shows that the analysis of patients considering all body motions simultaneously is viable using the existing monitoring technology in the hospital. As it was confirmed in previous studies [5,6], the performance of LOSO-CV schemes is strictly related to semiological patterns contained in the dataset. This is evident from the difference in classification performance between patients based on the deep learning architecture.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The CNN output is subsequently fed to a stacked LSTM architecture. We adopt an LSTM with 2 hidden layers of 128 and 64 units respectively [5]. Finally, the output of the second hidden recurrent layer is fed into a densely connected layer with a sigmoid activation function to describe the probability of each sequence having MTLE or ETLE behavior.…”
Section: Deep Learning Architecture and Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method obtained specificity, sensitivity and accuracy of 90.00, 95.00 and 88.67% respectively. Whereas in [16], developed a method to attempt to rxtract automatically and categorize the semiological patterns via facial expressions. Afterwards, they address the limitations of computer-based-analytical methods of the epilepsy-monitoring, where the movements of facial have been ignored.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, a framework known as task-constrained deep convolutional network (TCDCN) framework was used first, which is a facial These two models were then combined to improve the accuracy of the facial landmark detection and tracking across videos. This cascade framework follows previously established approaches (Jin, Su et al 2017, Ahmedt-Aristizabal, Fookes et al 2018). First, model 1 is used to detect the landmarks.…”
Section: Facial Landmark Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%