2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1069351311010010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep electromagnetic (MT and AMT) sounding of the suture zones of the Ukrainian shield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anomalous feature of the suture was studied in various papers (e.g. [Antsiferov et al,2011;Shirkov et al, 2017]) and its nature might be associated with the tectonomagmatic activation and fluid transport in the crust and mantle.…”
Section: Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomalous feature of the suture was studied in various papers (e.g. [Antsiferov et al,2011;Shirkov et al, 2017]) and its nature might be associated with the tectonomagmatic activation and fluid transport in the crust and mantle.…”
Section: Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the core, the value of the gravitational effect was de fined as 367,131.8 mGal. The gravitational effects from the up per and lower mantle were calculated using the data obtained from the five reference models (AK135, IASP91, PREM, PEMA, PEMC), adding the values for the crust at the point of calculation according to the data on the density of the crust of the Ukrainian Shield given by Svistun, et al [10], Kurlov, et al [13], Azarov, et al [14,15], Antsiferov, et al [16,17]. By com parison of the total amount with the value of 981,658.94 mGal, it was found that the value of the total gravity field calculated using the AK135 model has the smallest deviation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AdamsWilliamson equation (10) for the first iteration step requires initial density parameters ρ 0 . The initial densities at the 50 km level were provided by Kurlov, et al [13], Azarov, et al [14,15], Antsiferov, et al [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The region of the central part (49°15'-50°40' N × 28°45'-30° W) of the 3D geoelectric model area of the Zvizdal-Zaliska and Brusyliv FZ of the USH on the scheme of megablocks and fault zones of the USH (inset) according to data [Gintov et al, 2018] and the geological-tectonic map of the surface of the crystalline basement according to [State ..., 2003[State ..., , 2005]: 1 -deep and main faults (a), other tectonic disturbances (б); 2 -observation points of MTZ and MVP: in red according to data [Nikolaev et al, 2019, 2020, Ilyenko, 2020, in yellow and blue [Antsiferov et al, 2009]; 3 -tippers for a period of 100 s (observed in black, model calculated in red); 4 -profiles (I -Radomyshl-Fastiv [Nikolaev et al, 2019]), II -Korninsky [Ilienko et al, 2020] and III -Shirmivka-Logvin [Ilienko et al, 2019]). USH megablocks: П -Podil, Р -Rosyn, В -Volyn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%