2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b01878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep-Dive Targeted Quantification for Ultrasensitive Analysis of Proteins in Nondepleted Human Blood Plasma/Serum and Tissues

Abstract: Mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics (e.g., selected reaction monitoring, SRM) is emerging as an attractive alternative to immunoassays for protein quantification. Recently we have made significant progress in SRM sensitivity for enabling quantification of low nanograms per milliliter to sub-naograms per milliliter level proteins in nondepleted human blood plasma/serum without affinity enrichment. However, precise quantification of extremely low abundance proteins (e.g., ≤ 100 pg/mL in blood plasma/seru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AGR2, AGR3, CCL3, CEAM5, and CEAM6 were reliably detected and quantified except CCL4 and WISP1 (Figure 1 ). The reproducibility of LG-SRM and PRISM-SRM based assays for measurements in biofluids such as urine and serum was well validated in our previous reports, which typically had a coefficient of variance (CV) <10% [ 16 , 17 , 20 ]. With a combined LG-SRM and PRISM-SRM, SRM assays were established for each of the detectable peptides: three best transitions without matrix interference and the best transition for quantitation (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…AGR2, AGR3, CCL3, CEAM5, and CEAM6 were reliably detected and quantified except CCL4 and WISP1 (Figure 1 ). The reproducibility of LG-SRM and PRISM-SRM based assays for measurements in biofluids such as urine and serum was well validated in our previous reports, which typically had a coefficient of variance (CV) <10% [ 16 , 17 , 20 ]. With a combined LG-SRM and PRISM-SRM, SRM assays were established for each of the detectable peptides: three best transitions without matrix interference and the best transition for quantitation (Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Additionally, while many proteins and posttranslational modifications of high clinical interest will be detectable in clinical samples by immuno-MRM, some are likely to remain below the lower limit of quantification of the assay. In those cases where a sufficiently high affinity anti-peptide antibody cannot be developed, there are alternative approaches involving extensive sample fractionation that also provide highly sensitive, reproducible results 127129 , albeit at lower throughput using high complexity protocols. Second, subcellular localization or spatial resolution of protein expression (e.g., in different regions of a tumor with clonal heterogeneity, invasive edge vs hypoxic center of tumor) is not possible without additional sample processing such as macro- or micro-dissection of biospecimens.…”
Section: Limitations Of Targeted Mass Spectrometry-based Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for this might be found in the preconcentration of matrix compounds that thereby induces additional ion suppression. This can be overcome by applying offline or online 2D‐LC approaches using a large ID 1 st dimension column allowing the injection of a relatively high sample volume and a small ID 2 nd dimension column to maximize sensitivity. The offline approach allows easier analysis of multiple analytes, while the online heart cut 2D‐LC approach lowers the risk of compound loss due to recovery and/or degradation issues.…”
Section: Lc/ms: 2d‐lc Miniaturization and Lc Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%