2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-79150-6_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Dense and Convolutional Autoencoders for Machine Acoustic Anomaly Detection

Abstract: Recently, there have been advances in using unsupervised learning methods for Acoustic Anomaly Detection (AAD). In this paper, we propose an improved version of two deep AutoEncoders (AE) for unsupervised AAD for six types of working machines, namely Dense and Convolutional AEs. A large set of computational experiments was held, showing that the two proposed deep autoencoders, when combined with a mel-spectrogram sound preprocessing, are quite competitive and outperform a recently proposed AE baseline. Overall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed model made it possible to achieve a significant improvement in anomaly detection according to the data of machine sensors according to AUC 95.45%, compared to the previously proposed models [7,8,10,13]. Densenet+XGBoost improved by about 8% over the PCA model [7] applied to the log spectrogram of the audio signal combined with LOF and GMM on the MIMII dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed model made it possible to achieve a significant improvement in anomaly detection according to the data of machine sensors according to AUC 95.45%, compared to the previously proposed models [7,8,10,13]. Densenet+XGBoost improved by about 8% over the PCA model [7] applied to the log spectrogram of the audio signal combined with LOF and GMM on the MIMII dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Densenet+XGBoost gave comparable results (AUC 95.5%) on the reviewed MIMII dataset. Coelho et al [10] used CNN and Dense network in combination with an autoencoder for the task of unsupervised acoustic anomaly detection, where the results averaged 72.0%, 73.1%, 91.8%, and 78.9% for the fan, pump, slider, and valve, respectively. The accuracy of the proposed method is 93.1% for the fan, 97.3% for the pump, 98.4% for the slider, and 93.0% for the valve, which is significantly higher than the above result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This work is set within a larger R&D project that addresses an unsupervised in-vehicle intelligence using multiple data sources (e.g., images, sound, particles) and that includes the Bosch Car Multimedia S.A. (BCM) company. This paper presents the full research related with the in-vehicle AAD component of the R&D project, which corresponds to a large extended version of a previously published conference paper [18]. The main goal is to detect invehicle AAD, such as passengers arguing, coughing or an accidental breaking of glass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%