Currently, there are a number of diagnostic methods available for onychomycosis. Podiatric physicians often base diagnoses on clinical signs, which are highly predictive. 1 Dermatologists will more frequently perform laboratory tests to confirm a diagnosis of onychomycosis. 1 Fungal cultures involve taking a sample of the nail debris and nail plate, and placing it onto a petri dish with culture media. This process allows for identification of the pathogen subtype, but can take up to a month. It is also expensive and has a high rate of false-negative results and variable sensitivity. 1 Direct microscopic examination through the use of potassium hydroxide (KOH) preparation is considered optimal due to its quick and inexpensive nature, and is often combined with fungal cultures to increase sensitivity. 1 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) uses DNA to identify pathogen subtype, but is fairly expensive. However, as it becomes less costly, it may become the best option for diagnoses due to speed, sensitivity, robustness when encountering contaminants/less viable fungi, and its ability to identify mixed infections and less common causative agents. 1 Histopathological examination of the nail clippings is also commonly used; it involves staining samples with Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS), Grocott methenamine silver (GMS), or Calcofluor white (CFW). Histopathology is the most sensitive conventional diagnostic method; however, it does not provide the identity of the infecting organism(s). 2,3 A combination of methods will frequently result in better diagnostic results. 1,4 There have been a number of newer diagnostic tools emerging for onychomycosis, involving new technologies. Dermoscopy of the nail is a non-invasive option, but cannot identify the causative organism or its viability. Confocal microscopy is another non-invasive