2019
DOI: 10.1002/hed.25415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep convolutional neural network for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules on ultrasound

Abstract: Background We designed a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) to diagnose thyroid malignancy on ultrasound (US) and compared the diagnostic performance of CNN with that of experienced radiologists. Methods Between May 2012 and February 2015, 589 thyroid nodules in 519 patients were diagnosed as benign or malignant by surgical excision. Experienced radiologists retrospectively reviewed the US of the thyroid nodules in a test set. CNNs were trained and tested using retrospective data of 439 and 150 US images,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the rigid cutoff levels that were adopted to determine the diagnostic conclusion of the radiologists may also have influenced the per-formance of the radiologists. For instance, points 4a, 4b, and 5 of the TI-RADS criteria were adopted by researchers to determine the conclusion of radiologists during the diagnostic process [7,21,24]. It is probable that a different conclusion would have been drawn if the cutoff level had been adjusted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Second, the rigid cutoff levels that were adopted to determine the diagnostic conclusion of the radiologists may also have influenced the per-formance of the radiologists. For instance, points 4a, 4b, and 5 of the TI-RADS criteria were adopted by researchers to determine the conclusion of radiologists during the diagnostic process [7,21,24]. It is probable that a different conclusion would have been drawn if the cutoff level had been adjusted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pooled sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and DOR are demonstrated in Figure 2b. Eleven of the 13 studies compared the diagnostic performances of CAD systems and radiologists [7,20,21,[23][24][25][26][27][28]. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and DOR were comparable between the CAD systems and the radiologists (Fig.…”
Section: Diagnostic Performance Of Deep Learning-based Cad Systemsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations