2017 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icspcc.2017.8242581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep convolutional neural network for decoding motor imagery based brain computer interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. [45] applied a 7 layer CNN for a 2-class MI task and investigated the influence of the activation functions in the CNN. Three activation functions were tested, the ReLU, exponential linear unit (ELU) and scaled exponential linear unit (SELU).…”
Section: Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [45] applied a 7 layer CNN for a 2-class MI task and investigated the influence of the activation functions in the CNN. Three activation functions were tested, the ReLU, exponential linear unit (ELU) and scaled exponential linear unit (SELU).…”
Section: Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications using convolutional neural networks (CNN) are getting increasingly popular in the last few years, and this trend also reached the processing of EEG signals. J. Zhang et al [34] developed a method that uses deep-learning convolutional neural networks to classify imagined hand movements. X. Li et al [35] used CNN-s and RNN-s (recurrent neural networks) for recognition of human emotions.…”
Section: Processing Data With Neural Network 1) Neural Network Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For building 2D-maps in discrimination of MI tasks, several algorithms of feature extraction are employed in CNN models, including the following: common spatial patterns due to the high recognition rate and computational simplicity [16]; event-related synchronization to capture the channel-wise temporal dynamics of the power signal [17]; empirical mode decomposition to deal with EEG nonstationarity [18,19]; and time-frequency planes using the Fourier and wavelet transforms are frequently extracted because they allow a more straightforward interpretation [20][21][22][23], the latter decomposition being better suited to deal with sudden changes in EEG signals. Nonetheless, the extracted 2D images tend to have substantial variability in patterns across trials due to inherent nonstationarity, artifacts, a poor signal-to-noise ratio of EEG signals, individual differences in cortical functioning (like subjects exhibiting activity in different frequency bands).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%