2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.15718
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep convolutional forest: a dynamic deep ensemble approach for spam detection in text

Mai A. Shaaban,
Yasser F. Hassan,
Shawkat K. Guirguis

Abstract: The increase in people's use of mobile messaging services has led to the spread of social engineering attacks like phishing, considering that spam text is one of the main factors in the dissemination of phishing attacks to steal sensitive data such as credit cards and passwords. In addition, rumors and incorrect medical information regarding the COVID-19 pandemic are widely shared on social media leading to people's fear and confusion. Thus, filtering spam content is vital to reduce risks and threats. Previous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to [14], Ezpeleta et al (2016) used Facebook public information to personalize the spam content and create profile-based emails. Another neural-network-based model takes the details (frequency of words in uppercase and the numbers in the message along with the number of different colors, blank lines and the size of the message text) of texts rather than texts themselves as the input and got the accuracy of 97.5%[15]. In 2020,[4] Ezpeleta combine the input of the ham/spam dataset and the results of sentiment analysis and enter them into the given 10 Bayesian spam filtering models, 7 of them gained an increase in accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [14], Ezpeleta et al (2016) used Facebook public information to personalize the spam content and create profile-based emails. Another neural-network-based model takes the details (frequency of words in uppercase and the numbers in the message along with the number of different colors, blank lines and the size of the message text) of texts rather than texts themselves as the input and got the accuracy of 97.5%[15]. In 2020,[4] Ezpeleta combine the input of the ham/spam dataset and the results of sentiment analysis and enter them into the given 10 Bayesian spam filtering models, 7 of them gained an increase in accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%