2017
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2017.2681658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Convolutional Activations-Based Features for Ground-Based Cloud Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some representative samples of the five categories clouds are shown in Figure c. There are several studies (Dev et al, ; Shi et al, ) based on the SWIMCAT data set, but the data set does not include all the required cloud categories, which is insufficient from the perspective of meteorological research and applications. Cirrus Cumulus Stratus Nimbus (CCSN) Data set: we construct a CCSN data set under the meteorological criteria. The data set is three times larger than SWIMCAT and contains 2,543 unique ground‐based cloud images, which are labeled after several rounds of subjective classification based on visual characteristics and meteorological experts' experience.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some representative samples of the five categories clouds are shown in Figure c. There are several studies (Dev et al, ; Shi et al, ) based on the SWIMCAT data set, but the data set does not include all the required cloud categories, which is insufficient from the perspective of meteorological research and applications. Cirrus Cumulus Stratus Nimbus (CCSN) Data set: we construct a CCSN data set under the meteorological criteria. The data set is three times larger than SWIMCAT and contains 2,543 unique ground‐based cloud images, which are labeled after several rounds of subjective classification based on visual characteristics and meteorological experts' experience.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some representative samples of the five categories clouds are shown in Figure 2c. There are several studies (Dev et al, 2015;Shi et al, 2017) based on the SWIMCAT data set, but the data set does not include all the required cloud categories, which is insufficient from the perspective of meteorological research and applications. 2.…”
Section: Ground-based Cloud Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we compare our experimental result with all other previous studies that experimented with the same dataset (SWIMCAT). The performance metrics are calculated using confusion matrix data that were published in previous research (in the case of Shi et al [24], the detail confusion matrix data was not provided; only accuracy is compared). The first three papers [20], [16], and [19] applied traditional machine learning approaches and they obtained accuracies of 91.1%, 95.1%, and 98.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ye et al [22,23] improved feature extraction using a CNN by resorting to the deep convolutional visual features and the Fisher vector and then used an SVM classifier. Shi et al [24] proposed a CNN model to extract features using different pooling strategies and used a multi-label linear SVM classifier. Zhang et al [25] used a trained CNN to extract local features from part summing maps based on feature maps called deep visual information for multi-view ground-based cloud recognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afterward, they employed Fisher vector encoding to further improve the cloud classification results. Shi et al [25] extracted visual features from both the shallow and deep convolutional layers of the network. They also evaluated the performance of fully connected (FC) layer for cloud classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%