2018 IEEE Power &Amp; Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2018.8586661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Convolution Neural Network Based Fault Detection and Identification for Modular Multilevel Converters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 8 compares the recently published results of MMC fault diagnosis in [ 6 , 27 , 46 , 56 , 57 ] with ours. Although there are no direct comparisons due to different types of data used in [ 27 , 56 , 57 ], our proposed framework and the methods in [ 27 , 57 ] were compared in terms of the observed variables, number of measured parameters, number of health conditions used, fault detection accuracy, and testing time.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 8 compares the recently published results of MMC fault diagnosis in [ 6 , 27 , 46 , 56 , 57 ] with ours. Although there are no direct comparisons due to different types of data used in [ 27 , 56 , 57 ], our proposed framework and the methods in [ 27 , 57 ] were compared in terms of the observed variables, number of measured parameters, number of health conditions used, fault detection accuracy, and testing time.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Table 8 compares the recently published results of MMC fault diagnosis in [ 6 , 27 , 46 , 56 , 57 ] with ours. Although there are no direct comparisons due to different types of data used in [ 27 , 56 , 57 ], our proposed framework and the methods in [ 27 , 57 ] were compared in terms of the observed variables, number of measured parameters, number of health conditions used, fault detection accuracy, and testing time. The method used for MMC-HVDC DC fault detection in [ 56 ] achieved only 92.8% accuracy, while methods in [ 27 , 57 ], used for IGBT open-circuit fault diagnosis, obtain 98.9% and 98.2% accuracy respectively.…”
Section: Comparisons Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deep learning methods can avoid the problems of feature extraction, but the related publications are very limited in the application of MMC-HVDC systems. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [ 30 , 31 ], and 1-D CNN [ 32 ] are proposed for fault classification and fault location in MMC-HVDC. Our research group proposed CNN, AutoEncoder-based deep neural network (AE-based DNN), and SoftMax classifier for MMC [ 33 ], the results showed that these deep learning methods have good potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kiranyaz et al [26] use 1-D CNN to detect and localize the switch open-circuit fault using four cell capacitor voltage, circulating current and load current signals. This method can achieve a detection probability of 0.989 and an average identification probability of 0.997 in less than 100 ms. Qu et al [27] propose CNN for MMC fault detection using each capacitor's voltage signal. Wang et al [28] propose CNN for DC fault detection and classification using wavelet logarithmic energy entropy of transient current signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%