2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-020-01816-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep convolution feature aggregation: an application to diabetic retinopathy severity level prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bodapati et.al [36] 97.41 Chaturvedi et al [37] 96.51 Bodapati et al [38] 84.31 Proposed 97.93 The reported results show that our method achieved better performance than the comparative approaches, in terms of accuracy. It can be seen that our method achieved an average accuracy of 97.93% on the APTOS-2019 dataset and 98.10% on the IDRiD dataset, which is higher than other methods.…”
Section: Methods Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bodapati et.al [36] 97.41 Chaturvedi et al [37] 96.51 Bodapati et al [38] 84.31 Proposed 97.93 The reported results show that our method achieved better performance than the comparative approaches, in terms of accuracy. It can be seen that our method achieved an average accuracy of 97.93% on the APTOS-2019 dataset and 98.10% on the IDRiD dataset, which is higher than other methods.…”
Section: Methods Accuracy (%)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We compared our method results with other techniques on both datasets, namely, APTOS-2019 and IDRiD. For the APTOS-2019 database, we considered the reported results of the comparative techniques, i.e., Bodapati et al [ 36 ], Chaturvedi et al [ 37 ] and Bodapati et al [ 38 ], and the results are reported in Table 4 . While, for the IDRiD dataset, we compared our results with the approaches of Wu et al [ 39 ] and Luo et al [ 40 ] and an accuracy comparison is demonstrated in Table 5 .…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this experiment, we compared the model proposed with the state-of-the-art DR severity classification model and proved the effectiveness of our adaptively weighted fusion network of DR severity classification. Table 7 shows the performance comparison between the model obtained and the models used in [23][24][25]. We can see that the performance evaluation of the proposed method in this paper is significantly better than the existing models in the literature.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of the Proposed Methods With State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We can see that the performance evaluation of the proposed method in this paper is significantly better than the existing models in the literature. Compared with the model using VGG with feature fusion in [25], we also achieved 0.97 on AUC but improved accuracy and kappa score. Figure 9 shows the confusion matrix when our model is applied to the DR severity prediction task.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of the Proposed Methods With State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation