2019
DOI: 10.2138/gselements.15.5.319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Carbon and the Life Cycle of Large Igneous Provinces

Abstract: Carbon is central to the formation and environmental impact of large igneous provinces (LIPs). These vast magmatic events occur over geologically short timescales and include voluminous flood basalts, along with silicic and low-volume alkaline magmas. Surface outgassing of CO2 from flood basalts may average up to 3,000 Mt per year during LIP emplacement and is subsidized by fractionating magmas deep in the crust. The large quantities of carbon mobilized in LIPs may be sourced from the convecting mantle, lithos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, starting from the minimum calculated values of the CO 2 concentration within MIs (i.e., 0.5-0.6 wt%) as representative of CAMP magma, assuming an average density of 2.90 g/cm 3 for basaltic rocks 53 and considering 5-6 × 10 6 km 3 for the total volume of CAMP (in order to take into account the deep plumbing system), the total amount of degassed volcanic CO 2 during CAMP emplacement would be up to 10 5 Gt. Interestingly, the values estimated for the CO 2 concentration of CAMP magma (0.5-1.0 wt %) and for the total amount of degassed volcanic CO 2 during CAMP emplacement (up to 10 5 Gt) are consistent with those assessed in several other LIPs, using different approaches 29 . Full width at half maximum height (cm -1 ) Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, starting from the minimum calculated values of the CO 2 concentration within MIs (i.e., 0.5-0.6 wt%) as representative of CAMP magma, assuming an average density of 2.90 g/cm 3 for basaltic rocks 53 and considering 5-6 × 10 6 km 3 for the total volume of CAMP (in order to take into account the deep plumbing system), the total amount of degassed volcanic CO 2 during CAMP emplacement would be up to 10 5 Gt. Interestingly, the values estimated for the CO 2 concentration of CAMP magma (0.5-1.0 wt %) and for the total amount of degassed volcanic CO 2 during CAMP emplacement (up to 10 5 Gt) are consistent with those assessed in several other LIPs, using different approaches 29 . Full width at half maximum height (cm -1 ) Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…1 and Supplementary Table 1), and combined several in situ analytical techniques to investigate the presence of CO 2 within MI bubbles and constrain their formation depth. Our multidisciplinary analytical approach reveals that gas exsolution bubbles trapped in MIs are a previously unappreciated direct proxy of volatile species degassed during LIP magmatic activity [27][28][29] . In the case of CAMP, our analysis confirms the abundance of CO 2 (up to 10 5 Gt volcanic CO 2 degassed during CAMP emplacement) and indicates that at least part of this carbon has a middle-to lower-crust or mantle origin, suggesting that CAMP eruptions were rapid and potentially catastrophic for both climate and biosphere.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon released at plume settings is of uncertain origin, and is likely derived from multiple sources in the crust and mantle (Black and Gibson, 2019). While radiogenic isotope ratios (e.g., 3 He/ 4 He) suggest that mantle plume material may originate from a deep, primordial carbon reservoir (e.g., Marty et al, 2013), convecting mantle materials such as subducted slabs are likely to be entrained during plume upwellings, additionally contributing to the chemical composition of the plume and its carbon contribution (e.g., Sobolev et al, 2011).…”
Section: Plume-related Volcanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where two symbols are given a range of estimates is reported; a line to one or both sides of a point marks the uncertainty in the estimate. The flux estimates of Javoy and Pineau (1991) and Aubaud et al (2004) are not shown as they extend beyond the range of the figure (180 Mt C yr −1 and 160 +60 / −30 Mt C yr −1 respectively), as do the uncertainties of Zhang and Zindler (1993) and Cartigny et al (2008), and the maximum bounds of Dasgupta and Hirschmann (2006) The carbon liberated by a plume is likely to vary over its lifetime as a result of the temporal and spatial evolution it undergoes (e.g., Black and Gibson, 2019). In addition, neither the intrinsic properties of a mantle plume (e.g., potential temperature, buoyancy flux) nor the tectonic controls of melt generation (e.g., lithospheric thickness) appear to correlate with magmatic flux and degree of melting (Sleep, 1990), thereby affecting plume carbon fluxes, which, at the present-day, may differ between active plumes by several orders of magnitude (Werner et al, 2019).…”
Section: Plume-related Volcanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work has attempted to compare the recent rates of anthropogenic CO 2 release to periods of dramatic carbon release from deep reservoirs to the atmosphere-ocean system in Earth's history, which are recorded as light carbon isotope excursions in sedimentary records (Zeebe et al 2016). A large carbon isotopic excursion and associated mass extinction at the end of the Permian has been linked to the outpouring of 7-15 million km 3 basalt (Saunders 2005;Reichow et al 2009;Black et al 2012;Black and Gibson 2019) as well as the metamorphic devolatilization (Svensen et al 2009) and combustion (Ogden and Sleep 2012) of buried coal by sills. This event may have released 20 000 to 30 000 Pg C over as long as 10 5 years, but probably in discrete pulses over much shorter timescales (Black et al 2018).…”
Section: Implications For Present-day Anthropogenic Co 2 Release and mentioning
confidence: 99%