2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Nucleus Accumbens and Bed Nucleus of Stria Terminalis for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Case Series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…53,111 Stimulation of the stria terminalis for OCD has not been extensively studied, but in a limited case series it was found to be comparably efficacious to NAcc stimulation. 113 The specific target remains unclear, though, with another group targeting the junction between the NAcc and the caudate nucleus. These authors argue that the improvement in compulsive symptoms is actually secondary to caudate stimulation, whereas NAcc stimulation primarily mitigates the depressive symptoms.…”
Section: 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53,111 Stimulation of the stria terminalis for OCD has not been extensively studied, but in a limited case series it was found to be comparably efficacious to NAcc stimulation. 113 The specific target remains unclear, though, with another group targeting the junction between the NAcc and the caudate nucleus. These authors argue that the improvement in compulsive symptoms is actually secondary to caudate stimulation, whereas NAcc stimulation primarily mitigates the depressive symptoms.…”
Section: 53mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advent of DBS as a therapy for advanced movement disorders has generated interest in novel indications such as OCD 11. While several DBS targets are under study and have exhibited promise, including the anterior limb of the internal capsule,12 the nucleus accumbens,10 13 14 subthalamic nucleus13 15 and the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis,16 there have been no reported, demonstrable differences between targets 17. Importantly, several established DBS targets are in close proximity anatomically and thus stimulation to one area has potential off-target effects 18–20.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our post hoc analysis, we did not find relevant demographic or clinical predictors. Often discussed aspects that may reduce the effectiveness of DBS for OCD, such as poor insight into the irrationality of obsessions and compulsions,27 personality traits and symptom categories as measured by the HZI, did not significantly correlate with the outcome. Thus, further research on which patient qualifies best for neuromodulation is highly important to improving this treatment strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%