2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2004.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep brain stimulation for movement disorders and pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its pertinent anatomical boundaries in the midbrain include the medial lemniscus laterally, superior colliculus inferoposteriorly and the red nucleus inferoanteriorly. Further explanations of our neurosurgical procedure and target localisation techniques are published elsewhere [8,27,28,29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its pertinent anatomical boundaries in the midbrain include the medial lemniscus laterally, superior colliculus inferoposteriorly and the red nucleus inferoanteriorly. Further explanations of our neurosurgical procedure and target localisation techniques are published elsewhere [8,27,28,29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in deep brain stimulation (DBS) of specific targets in the human brain have been successful in alleviating the symptoms of otherwise treatment-resistant disorders; mainly chronic pain [1][2][3], phantom pain [4], cluster headache [5], and motor disorders including Parkinson's disease [6], multiple sclerosis or essential tremor, dystonia and spasmodic torticollis [7] with some success also reported for unipolar depression [8]. The data so far suggest that lowfrequency stimulation works particularly well for the treatment of pain, whereas high-frequency stimulation works best for movement disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From insights revealed by basal ganglia microelectrode recordings and DBS for movement disorders reviewed elsewhere [102][103][104], we postulate that altered rhythmic activity in VP and PAG neurons is likely to play an important role in the pathophysiology of central pain. At either target, our clinical experience is that, in general, DBS at lower frequencies (≤50 Hz) is analgesic and at higher frequencies (>70 Hz) hyperalgesic [79,105,106], supporting a dynamic model whereby synchronous oscillations in discrete neuronal populations centrally modulate chronic pain perception. Analgesic DBS may therefore either disrupt pathological high-frequency synchronous oscillations or, more likely, augment pathologically diminished low-frequency synchronous oscillations in the thalamic and reticular components of a reticulo-thalamo-corticofugal pain neuromatrix.…”
Section: Physiologymentioning
confidence: 93%