2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2006.00067.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia: A Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
3
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22,24 Not all studies were designed initially for combined stimulation; in some studies a secondary surgery was performed to implant electrodes at different targets after failure of the first. 9,17,24 A 2006 meta-analysis 9 showed that the GPi stimulation had significantly better outcomes compared with the posterior portion of the ventrolateral nucleus of the thalamus, which includes Vim and part of the ventral oral (Vo) complex, 9,16 but the majority of the patients reviewed had primary dystonia. 9 The thalamic anatomy has many descriptions that could lead to targeting changes, and the fact that it has unclear and overlapped nuclear borders interferes with the clinical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…22,24 Not all studies were designed initially for combined stimulation; in some studies a secondary surgery was performed to implant electrodes at different targets after failure of the first. 9,17,24 A 2006 meta-analysis 9 showed that the GPi stimulation had significantly better outcomes compared with the posterior portion of the ventrolateral nucleus of the thalamus, which includes Vim and part of the ventral oral (Vo) complex, 9,16 but the majority of the patients reviewed had primary dystonia. 9 The thalamic anatomy has many descriptions that could lead to targeting changes, and the fact that it has unclear and overlapped nuclear borders interferes with the clinical analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,17,24 A 2006 meta-analysis 9 showed that the GPi stimulation had significantly better outcomes compared with the posterior portion of the ventrolateral nucleus of the thalamus, which includes Vim and part of the ventral oral (Vo) complex, 9,16 but the majority of the patients reviewed had primary dystonia. 9 The thalamic anatomy has many descriptions that could lead to targeting changes, and the fact that it has unclear and overlapped nuclear borders interferes with the clinical analysis. Even changes inside a thalamic nucleus can have a different effect; for example, the posteromedial part of the Vim can treat tremor and drug-induced dyskinesias, and the anterolateral part can only treat tremor, 22 which can also be explained by stimulation of a nearby nucleus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…61 In addition, although there has been one rigorous trial examining the efficacy of GPi DBS in primary dystonia, 56 the reports of DBS for secondary dystonia consist of small case series. 62 Trials are underway to examine the efficacy of DBS for tardive dystonia (Clinicaltrials. gov, Identifier No.…”
Section: The Future Of Dbs For Movement Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%