2020
DOI: 10.1002/ana.25887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep Brain Stimulation for Chronic Cluster Headache: Meta‐Analysis of Individual Patient Data

Abstract: Objective: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a treatment option for refractory chronic cluster headache (CCH). Despite several recent prospective case series reporting a good outcome, the effectiveness and the optimal stimulation target of DBS for CCH remain unclear. We aimed to obtain precise estimates and predictors of long-term pain relief in an individual patient data meta-analysis. Furthermore, we aimed to construct a probabilistic stimulation map of effective DBS. Methods: We invited investigators of publi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This group found that in 40 patients in four different cohorts, mean reduction in headache frequency was 77% during a follow-up of 44 months, with an overall response rate of 75%. A map of brain region stimulation for therapeutic effect of DBS identified the midbrain ventral and retrorubral tegmentum as important sites [85]. This meta-analysis also reinforces the current view that DBS in the ventral tegmental area probably acts upon pain circuits involved in maintaining CH [36].…”
Section: Dbs For Cchsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This group found that in 40 patients in four different cohorts, mean reduction in headache frequency was 77% during a follow-up of 44 months, with an overall response rate of 75%. A map of brain region stimulation for therapeutic effect of DBS identified the midbrain ventral and retrorubral tegmentum as important sites [85]. This meta-analysis also reinforces the current view that DBS in the ventral tegmental area probably acts upon pain circuits involved in maintaining CH [36].…”
Section: Dbs For Cchsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Recently, Nowacki and his team have published a meta-analysis [85] to present estimates and predictors of long-term pain relief based on the cohorts of patients undergoing DBS for CCH. This group found that in 40 patients in four different cohorts, mean reduction in headache frequency was 77% during a follow-up of 44 months, with an overall response rate of 75%.…”
Section: Dbs For Cchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some CCH patients do not tolerate or respond to the currently used preventive drugs and are, therefore, classified as rCCH patients 5 . Non‐pharmacological therapeutic strategies have been tried over the last few decades to provide relief to these patients, including invasive occipital nerve stimulation, sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation, and deep brain stimulation 6‐9 . Recently, monoclonal antagonist antibodies targeting calcitonin gene‐related peptide have provided new hopes for the prevention of CH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the positive effect on attack frequency of continuous hypothalamic stimulation may support the idea of hypothalamic involvement [126]. However, there are persisting doubts about the precise structures that stimulation needs to target to achieve therapeutic success [127,128].…”
Section: The Hypothalamusmentioning
confidence: 91%