1977
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(77)90092-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deep body temperature: Diurnal variation, sex, and personality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VEP studies have shown that early components (e.g., P50, N70, and P100) have higher amplitudes (La Marche et al, ; Celesia et al, ; Mitchell et al, ; Shibata et al, ; Sharma et al, ) and/or shorter latencies (Stockard et al, ; Celesia et al, ; Emmerson‐Hanover et al, ; Shibata et al, ; Malcolm et al, ; Langrova et al, ; Proverbio et al, ; Sharma et al, ) in females compared with males (but see Grabowska et al, ). There is evidence that the properties of these VEP components are related to contrast sensitivity (discussed earlier) performance (Allen et al, ; Norcia et al, ; Souza et al, ), although the sex differences seen in these studies may have been secondary to underlying anatomical differences (Christie and McBrearty, ; Dekaban and Sadowsky, ; Reilly et al, ; Allison et al, ). Other studies have shown that sex differences in VEPs are not related to differences in gonadal hormones (Buchsbaum et al, ; Dyer and Swartzwelder, ) and arise in the visual cortex, not in the retina (Celesia et al, ; Tomoda et al, ).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Basic Visual Processingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…VEP studies have shown that early components (e.g., P50, N70, and P100) have higher amplitudes (La Marche et al, ; Celesia et al, ; Mitchell et al, ; Shibata et al, ; Sharma et al, ) and/or shorter latencies (Stockard et al, ; Celesia et al, ; Emmerson‐Hanover et al, ; Shibata et al, ; Malcolm et al, ; Langrova et al, ; Proverbio et al, ; Sharma et al, ) in females compared with males (but see Grabowska et al, ). There is evidence that the properties of these VEP components are related to contrast sensitivity (discussed earlier) performance (Allen et al, ; Norcia et al, ; Souza et al, ), although the sex differences seen in these studies may have been secondary to underlying anatomical differences (Christie and McBrearty, ; Dekaban and Sadowsky, ; Reilly et al, ; Allison et al, ). Other studies have shown that sex differences in VEPs are not related to differences in gonadal hormones (Buchsbaum et al, ; Dyer and Swartzwelder, ) and arise in the visual cortex, not in the retina (Celesia et al, ; Tomoda et al, ).…”
Section: Sex Differences In Basic Visual Processingmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Comparison of the circadian temperature rhythms of young women versus young men reveals a very different pattern of gender differences than that seen in elderly subjects. Young females have a higher mean temperature 19 , 20 , 21 and a smaller amplitude than young males 21 , 22 . With regard to phase, results have been inconsistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported that females generally have larger P100 amplitudes than males (3,7,8,13,26,39), and elderly females have shorter latencies and increased amplitudes compared with elderly males (4, 12, 18, 39±42). It has been suggested that the shorter P100 latency in females compared with males is due to the smaller brain volume (8), head size (43), the higher core temperature (44,45), endocrine factors (16) or sex hormones (46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%