“…For the front cell, a PCE of 8.86% with J sc of 12.6 mA cm −2 , V oc of 0.95 V, and fi ll factor (FF) of 74% was achieved, while for the back cell, a PCE of 8.09% with J sc of 17.01 mA cm −2 , V oc of 0.78 V, and FF of 61% was achieved based on the fabrication procedure in previous report. [ 40 ] Despite the fact that both cells show high PCEs, the FF obtained in the back cell is obviously lower, which may lead to poor tandem cell effi ciency. [ 41 ] Therefore, we further optimized the back-cell performance by employing solvent vapor annealing (SVA) treatment, which is a simple and effective way for improving the absorption, morphology, and charge mobility in small molecule-based BHJ.…”