2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DEDUCE: A pattern matching method for automatic de-identification of Dutch medical text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used deidentified data sets by deidentifying clinical notes using the Deindentification Method for Dutch Medical Text (DEDUCE) method. 19 Demographic variables were limited to sex, year of birth, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) diagnosis. The study was reviewed and approved by the University Medical Center Utrecht ethical committee.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used deidentified data sets by deidentifying clinical notes using the Deindentification Method for Dutch Medical Text (DEDUCE) method. 19 Demographic variables were limited to sex, year of birth, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) diagnosis. The study was reviewed and approved by the University Medical Center Utrecht ethical committee.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complete corpus of doctor and nurse notes (i.e., all notes written before, during or after admission) in the same time period was also made available, totaling 1,015,931 doctor and nurse notes combined. All notes are de-identified using the De-identification Method for Dutch Medical Text (DEDUCE) [54] before any other processing took place. The subset of notes that was available at the start of admission served as input for the prediction problem, while the entire corpus of notes were used to learn representations of text.…”
Section: Text Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate performance between English and Dutch datasets, the nursing notes corpus dataset [1] (2,434 records, about 1,800 PHI instances) and the 2014 i2b2 dataset were also used. DEDUCE, a rule-based approach developed for Dutch medical records, was adopted by the researchers [65]. For the CRF approach, a subset of features from a token-based approach by Liu et al [37] was utilized.…”
Section: Trienes Et Al 2020 [47] (Comparing Rule-based Feature-basementioning
confidence: 99%