2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2018.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dedolomitization: review and case study of uncommon mesogenetic formation conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7). The presence of stylolites acting as barriers to calcitization fluids has also been reported from studies of mudstones of the Zechstein Ca2 Stassfurt carbonate of the Southern Permian Basin (NW Germany) (Koehn et al, 2016;Schoenherr et al, 2018;Humphrey et al, 2019). Although the extent and distribution of dolomite recrystallization and calcitization products are difficult to quantify, the Benicàssim case study demonstrates that stylolites can constrain these diagenetic reactions acting as barriers for the fluids that caused them.…”
Section: Stylolites As Dolomite Recrystallization and Calcitization Reaction Bafflesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…7). The presence of stylolites acting as barriers to calcitization fluids has also been reported from studies of mudstones of the Zechstein Ca2 Stassfurt carbonate of the Southern Permian Basin (NW Germany) (Koehn et al, 2016;Schoenherr et al, 2018;Humphrey et al, 2019). Although the extent and distribution of dolomite recrystallization and calcitization products are difficult to quantify, the Benicàssim case study demonstrates that stylolites can constrain these diagenetic reactions acting as barriers for the fluids that caused them.…”
Section: Stylolites As Dolomite Recrystallization and Calcitization Reaction Bafflesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…undersaturated with respect to dolomite and oversaturated with respect to calcite) and be able to remove the liberated Mg 2+ to maintain dolomite undersaturation (Ayora et al, 1998). Importantly, dedolomitisation is known to occur under a wide variety of conditions, from karst and shallow subsurface settings due to interaction with meteoric waters at relatively low temperatures (<50 °C) and CO 2 partial pressures (Flügel, 2010;Nader et al, 2008;Rameil, 2008;Vandeginste and John, 2012) to deep burial environments (Budai et al, 1984;Land and Prezbindowski, 1981;Schoenherr et al, 2018;Woo and Moore, 1996) and hydrothermal systems (e.g., Faust, 1949;Matsumoto et al, 1988;Stoessell et al, 1987), such as those envisaged for the Zaonega Formation. One of the most convincing features to identify dedolomitisation microscopically is the replacement of dolomite rhombohedrons by equicrystalline anhedral calcite (Schoenherr et al, 2018).…”
Section: Secondary Alteration In the Zaonega Carbonate Rocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vicinity of the veins. The intensification of dedolomitisation at bed margins acted to reduce permeability (as documented, for example, in Permian Zechstein carbonate rocks;Schoenherr et al, 2018) thereby shielding the middle part of carbonate beds from pervasive alteration.Dedolomitisation was additionally hindered inside the carbonates beds due to the closedsystem behaviour with smaller supply of Ca 2+ and/or slower removal of liberated Mg.Decreasing fluid temperatures inward are also evident from petrographical features of dolomite-calcite aggregates in the carbonate beds of the Zaonega Formation: these change from calcite occurring as patchy dolomite replacement in bed interiors to pseudomorphic replacement along the bed margins. Such textures have been generated in hydrothermal dedolomitisation experiments(Stoessell et al, 1988) via calcite replacement of dolomite in the interior of dolomite crystals associated with crystal imperfections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Diagenetic facies (Diagenetic Carbonate Subunit), as here described, are characteristic products of meteoric diagenesis in near-surface environments [34,[61][62][63][64][65], whose formation may be related to water table fluctuations [66] and/or major changes in basin paleogeography [35,62,67]. Additionally, several features demonstrate the subaerial and pre-burial nature of the Intra-Vallesian paleokarst such as (i) breccia deposits that include pseudospar and speleothem fragments, together with fluvial deposits capping the karst surface; and (ii) cave-fill deposits (clays, subarkoses and flowstones) within the subsurface karst system.…”
Section: Evolutionary Model Of the Intra-vallesian Paleokarstmentioning
confidence: 85%