2010
DOI: 10.1198/jbes.2009.06129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decriminalization and Marijuana Smoking Prevalence: Evidence From Australia

Abstract: This paper uses the 2001 wave of National Drug Strategy Household Survey (NDSHS) to assess the impact of marijuana decriminalization policy on marijuana smoking prevalence in Australia. Both parametric and non-parametric methods are used. The parametric approach postulates an endogenous probit switching model and its nested binary probit, endogenous bivariate probit and two-part models to estimate this impact. The non-parametric approach uses the propensity score stratification matching to compute alternative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chaloupka (1995, 1998) and Pacula, Chriqui, and King (2003) found the impact of depenalization on marijuana smoking in the United States to have been positive and significant. Similar positive effects in Australia have been reported by Williams (2004), Zhao and Harris (2004), and Damrongplasit, Hsio, and Zhao (2010). The latter study is particularly noteworthy because it controlled for the possibility that cannabis users might migrate to depenalization states.…”
Section: Deterrencesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Chaloupka (1995, 1998) and Pacula, Chriqui, and King (2003) found the impact of depenalization on marijuana smoking in the United States to have been positive and significant. Similar positive effects in Australia have been reported by Williams (2004), Zhao and Harris (2004), and Damrongplasit, Hsio, and Zhao (2010). The latter study is particularly noteworthy because it controlled for the possibility that cannabis users might migrate to depenalization states.…”
Section: Deterrencesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Analysis of nationally-representative data from the late 1980s onward supports the conclusion that decriminalization is associated with a higher likelihood marijuana use, by about 8% (Saffer and Chaloupka 1999) to 16% (Damrongplasit, Hsiao et al 2010). Analysis of Monitoring the Future data from 1992–1994 led to the conclusion that “youths living in decriminalized states are significantly more likely to report currently using marijuana and may consume more frequently” (Chaloupka, Pacula et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The "treatment effect" (Greene, 2004;Damrongplasit et al, 2007) of having a particular chronic health condition on the probability of labour force participation for an individual X can be estimated as the difference in the predicted conditional probabilities of labour force participation with and without a health condition:…”
Section: Marginal and Conditional Probabilities And "Treatment Effects"mentioning
confidence: 99%