2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-011-0954-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decreasing the configurational entropy and the hydrophobicity of EBV-derived peptide 11389 increased its antigenicity, immunogenicity and its ability of inducing IL-6

Abstract: Peptide 11389 from CD21-binding region of EBV-gp350/220 protein binds to PBMCs inducing IL-6 expression and inhibiting EBV-binding to PBMCs. In addition, anti-peptide 11389 antibodies recognize EBV-infected cells and inhibit both EBV infection and IL-6 production in PBMCs. We have postulated that native structure stabilization of peptide 11389 sequence can increase its biological activity. The strategy was to modify its sequence to restrict the number of structures that peptide 11389 could acquire in solution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A majority of the empirical scoring functions estimate Δ G as a weighted sum of free energy components. The weights are usually obtained by partial least-squares regression fitting to a training data set of protein–ligand complexes. Studies show that some of the underlying terms constituting Δ G reflect the enthalpy and entropy changes upon binding. , Despite the development of scoring functions to predict binding energies, very few attempts have been made to predict the thermodynamic components underlying the binding affinities. , In addition to estimating Δ G , most of the existing scoring functions provide little or no information (either qualitative or quantitative) about Δ H and T Δ S values. It is possible that the same values of binding energies could have varying proportions of enthalpy and entropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of the empirical scoring functions estimate Δ G as a weighted sum of free energy components. The weights are usually obtained by partial least-squares regression fitting to a training data set of protein–ligand complexes. Studies show that some of the underlying terms constituting Δ G reflect the enthalpy and entropy changes upon binding. , Despite the development of scoring functions to predict binding energies, very few attempts have been made to predict the thermodynamic components underlying the binding affinities. , In addition to estimating Δ G , most of the existing scoring functions provide little or no information (either qualitative or quantitative) about Δ H and T Δ S values. It is possible that the same values of binding energies could have varying proportions of enthalpy and entropy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%