2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decreased interhemispheric connectivity and increased cortical excitability in unmedicated schizophrenia: A prefrontal interleaved TMS fMRI study

Abstract: Background: Prefrontal abnormalities in schizophrenia have consistently emerged from resting state and cognitive neuroimaging studies. However, these correlative findings require causal verification via combined imaging/stimulation approaches. To date, no interleaved transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging study (TMS fMRI) has probed putative prefrontal cortex abnormalities in schizophrenia. Objective: /Hypothesis: We hypothesized that subjects with schizophrenia would show … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The abnormalities in brain regions between SZ patients and NCs were primarily in the bilateral prefrontal cortex, right limbic system, left temporal cortex and left motor strip. While the findings on the prefrontal cortex (Janousova et al, 2015;Ou et al, 2015;Zhuang et al, 2019;Webler et al, 2020), limbic system (Shon et al, 2018;Abdolalizadeh et al, 2020;Falakshahi et al, 2020), and temporal cortex (Shu et al, 2012;Ehrlich et al, 2014;Schnack et al, 2014;Koch et al, 2018;Chatterjee et al, 2020) are aligned with previous studies, the discovery of differences in the motor strip has rarely been reported. The motor strip is imperative as the neural hub that participates in perception, action and anticipation in relation to the environment (Schroeder et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The abnormalities in brain regions between SZ patients and NCs were primarily in the bilateral prefrontal cortex, right limbic system, left temporal cortex and left motor strip. While the findings on the prefrontal cortex (Janousova et al, 2015;Ou et al, 2015;Zhuang et al, 2019;Webler et al, 2020), limbic system (Shon et al, 2018;Abdolalizadeh et al, 2020;Falakshahi et al, 2020), and temporal cortex (Shu et al, 2012;Ehrlich et al, 2014;Schnack et al, 2014;Koch et al, 2018;Chatterjee et al, 2020) are aligned with previous studies, the discovery of differences in the motor strip has rarely been reported. The motor strip is imperative as the neural hub that participates in perception, action and anticipation in relation to the environment (Schroeder et al, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…A recent case-control study by Webler et al (2020) assessed for prefrontal excitability and interhemispheric functional connectivity using concurrent TMS/fMRI in schizophrenia patients and compared them with healthy controls. In both groups, resting motor threshold (RMT) was estimated at baseline and the left-sided DLPFC (Brodmann area 9) was then stimulated using 35 triplet TMS pulses at 100 ms apart (10Hz) at 0, 80, 100, and 120% of RMT in a randomized order.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study found that schizophrenia patients showed hyperexcitability in left-sided BA9 and BA46 compared to healthy controls for equal TMS intensity. Also, on stimulating the left BA9, healthy controls showed increased right-sided BA9 activity compared to schizophrenia patients, thereby demonstrating impaired interhemispheric connectivity in the patients ( Webler et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concurrent TMS-fMRI was first performed by (Bohning et al, 1997), and experiments have been on the rise in both healthy (Bohning et al, 1997; Nahas et al, 2001; Denslow et al, 2005; Bestmann et al, 2008b; de Vries et al, 2009; Moisa et al, 2009, 2010; Li et al, 2011; Ricci et al, 2012; Hanlon et al, 2013; Schintu et al, 2021; Oathes et al, 2021) and clinical populations (Li et al, 2004; Bestmann et al, 2006; de Vries et al, 2012; Webler et al, 2020). This is not surprising given that this multimodal approach allows to, not only examine the altered brain connectivity patterns of neurological and psychiatric patients but, also to investigate how local stimulation of focal brain regions can alter those same connectivity patterns, in vivo .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%