ObservationsPredictors of the development of impaired fasting glucose versus impaired glucose tolerance are partly different in men: a 6-year follow-up study To the Editor: Some studies have confirmed that impaired glucose tolerance and Type 2 diabetes share common aetiological factors such as obesity, abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, impaired insulin secretion, family history of diabetes, age and sedentariness [1,2]. As for IGT, impaired fasting glucose is considered as an intermediate metabolic state between normal and diabetic glucose homeostasis. The aetiology of IFG, however, remains unclear. Several studies have suggested that IGT and IFG are two classes of glucose homeostasis disorders, which could describe two distinct populations with differing cardiovascular risk [2,3].Our aim was to examine factors potentially related to the development of impaired glucose regulation in a sample of men tested over a 6-year follow-up who all had a normal glucose tolerance at baseline. No study has yet documented the respective contribution of regional body-fat distribution as measured by computed tomography (CT) and of indices of plasma glucose-insulin homeostasis to the development of IFG in men. Therefore, as a specific objective, we compared isolated IFG to isolated IGT in terms of their metabolic and anthropometric predictors.The study was conducted in men (20-62 years of age at baseline) recruited through media advertising in the Quebec City metropolitan area. All subjects were healthy and were not under treatment for coronary heart disease, diabetes, dyslipidaemias or endocrine disorders. At baseline, all men involved in this study had a NGT. At follow-up (mean follow-up: 6.4±1.1 year), some men developed a deteriorated glucose tolerance state whereas others remained with a NGT. A total of 71 men had a NGT at baseline and kept a NGT at follow-up whereas 24 developed an impaired glucose regulation state (did not remain NGT). Among the 24 men who developed impaired glucose regulation, 8 developed isolated IFG and 12 developed isolated IGT. The American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria (1997) were used to determine the glucose tolerance status [4]. All participants signed an informed consent document before entering the study, which was approved by the Laval University Medical Ethics Committee.Height, body weight, waist and hip circumferences as well as body fat mass were measured using standardised procedures Diabetologia (2004) Men who developed isolated IFG had at baseline body composition and body-fat distribution variables that were not significantly different from men who remained NGT throughout the follow-up (Table 1). In contrast, men who developed isolated IGT during the follow-up had significantly higher BMI, waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio than men who remained NGT and tended (p=0.09) to have higher visceral AT accumulation.Men who developed isolated IFG during the follow-up had, at baseline, higher FPG concentrations and lower insulin secretion as evaluated by Stumvoll 1st phas...