Abstract-Endothelin receptor antagonism lowers blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension, but the contribution of the endothelin system to increased vascular tone in these patients remains controversial. We used strain-gauge venous plethysmography to measure changes in basal and metabolically stimulated (peak reactive hyperemia [PRH]) forearm blood flow (FBF) induced by continuous intrabrachial infusion of SB 209670, a dual endothelin type A/endothelin type B receptor antagonist (ETRA) in 11 patients with hypertension and 12 healthy age-matched control subjects. In both groups, ETRA caused significant vasodilation (increase in FBF compared with baseline over the last 30 minutes of ETRA infusion: 75Ϯ12% in control subjects, 40Ϯ13% in hypertension patients; PϽ0.01 for both groups). By repeated-measures ANOVA, there was no greater increase in FBF after ETRA in hypertension patients compared with control subjects. In addition, FBF responses to PRH, expressed as percent change from baseline (prePRH), were similar in both groups (control subjects: preETRA, 1381Ϯ222%; during ETRA, 921Ϯ178%; and hypertension patients: preETRA, 1232Ϯ221%: during ETRA, 865Ϯ285%). We conclude that basal and stimulated vasodilation induced by short-term ETRA infusion in the forearm vasculature of hypertension patients is not increased compared with that of control subjects. An enhanced contribution of the endothelin system to vascular tone in hypertension patients could not be demonstrated using this experimental approach. There has, however, been some uncertainty regarding the contribution of ET-1 to the pathogenesis and/or progression of essential hypertension in man. The development of specific endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRAs) has enabled clinical investigators to further assess this contribution.Chronic (4-week) administration of an ETRA (bosentan) lowers blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension, 2 but whether the endothelin system is specifically involved in the increased vascular tone of these patients remains controversial. 3 Local intraarterial infusion of an ETRA into a vascular bed, with measurement of effects on resting blood flow, has been used in an attempt to address this specific question. In one such study, infusion of a selective ET A receptor antagonist into the forearm vasculature of patients with hypertension caused significant vasodilation; this was greater than that observed in normal subjects. 4 However, this difference was largely accounted for by the absence of significant vasodilation in the normal subjects, a finding at odds with a number of previous studies, which have consistently observed substantial vasodilation to an ET A antagonist in these subjects. [5][6][7][8][9][10] In addition, the contribution of ET-1 to the vasodilator response to metabolic stimuli such as postischemic reactive hyperemia has not been previously determined in patients with hypertension.In an attempt to clarify the above issues, the present study sought to compare the effect of a potent dual ET A /ET B ...