2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1095-6433(00)00194-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decreased colonic mucus in rats with loperamide-induced constipation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
70
1
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
16
70
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there were no significant differences on the fecal water content and the concentration of each cecal SCFA among groups. The drop in fecal water content in control rats with constipation (Table 5) was not as low as that in a previous study using loperamide (about 60%) (19). This indicated that constipation was not fully induced in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…However, there were no significant differences on the fecal water content and the concentration of each cecal SCFA among groups. The drop in fecal water content in control rats with constipation (Table 5) was not as low as that in a previous study using loperamide (about 60%) (19). This indicated that constipation was not fully induced in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…This observation was also reported in previous studies [16]. However, loperamide did not prevent the animals from feeding adequately [11].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Bile salt deconjugation is the obligatory first reaction in further oxidation and dehydroxylation steps of bile salts by intestinal bacteria, and it includes the production of secondary bile salts that have been linked to various intestinal diseases, such as the formation of gallstones and colon cancer (Ridlon et al, 2006). Moreover, results of in vitro studies have suggested that bile salt deconjugation plays a role in mucin production and excretion in the intestinal lumen (Klinkspoor et al, 1999), and this could affect the nutritional environment encountered by the intestinal microbiota, and intestinal transit time (Shimotoyodome et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%