2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decreased Cerebellar-Orbitofrontal Connectivity Correlates with Stuttering Severity: Whole-Brain Functional and Structural Connectivity Associations with Persistent Developmental Stuttering

Abstract: Persistent developmental stuttering is characterized by speech production disfluency and affects 1% of adults. The degree of impairment varies widely across individuals and the neural mechanisms underlying the disorder and this variability remain poorly understood. Here we elucidate compensatory mechanisms related to this variability in impairment using whole-brain functional and white matter connectivity analyses in persistent developmental stuttering. We found that people who stutter had stronger functional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the functional disconnection from the speech production network included not only the left orbitofrontal cortex but also caudal parts of the superior cerebellum. A functional connection between these two regions has recently been related to compensation attempts in PS (Sitek et al, 2016), and efficient stuttering therapy was shown to disconnect the superior cerebellum from the speech production system during rest (Lu et al, 2012). We show here that the cortical normalization of auditory-motor mapping can lead to long-lasting recovery in case it is accompanied by plasticity involving the superior cerebellum and left orbitofrontal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, the functional disconnection from the speech production network included not only the left orbitofrontal cortex but also caudal parts of the superior cerebellum. A functional connection between these two regions has recently been related to compensation attempts in PS (Sitek et al, 2016), and efficient stuttering therapy was shown to disconnect the superior cerebellum from the speech production system during rest (Lu et al, 2012). We show here that the cortical normalization of auditory-motor mapping can lead to long-lasting recovery in case it is accompanied by plasticity involving the superior cerebellum and left orbitofrontal cortex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, during resting state, subjects do not necessarily enter a consistent 'default mode', because participants may differ largely in covert behavior or vigilance (Tagliazucchi & Laufs, 2014). Altogether, functional connectivity studies in adults who stutter revealed abnormal connectivity between Broca's region and the premotor cortex (Chang et al, 2011) or the rest of the resting state language network in the bilateral fronto-temporo-parietal cortex (Lu et al, 2012), reduced auditory-motor coupling (Watkins, 2011), a hyper-connectivity in right homologue areas (Chang et al, 2011), and enhanced, compensatory cerebello-orbitofrontal connectivity (Sitek et al, 2016). Auditory-motor hypo-connectivity was confirmed in boys who stutter together with connectivity changes of the putamen (Chang & Zhu, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, we found a significantly negative correlation between the activation of the right inferior frontal gyrus and its connectivity with the left cerebellum, suggesting that hyperactivity in this region may compensate for its reduced functional connectivity with other regions. In addition, the structural connectivity of the left cerebellum has been found to be negatively correlated with the severity of stuttering (Sitek et al, 2016). Previous studies have reported alternated resting-state functional connectivity of the left cerebellum in PWS Yang et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%