Abstract:Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is one of the most common autosomal dominant diseases. Although there is a considerable variability in clinical expression, NF1 is almost fully penetrant in adult patients and may be associated with a variety of skeletal anomalies. Spinal deformities are the most common skeletal manifestation, with an incidence estimated from 10-25% in various studies. Some NF1 patients have a dystrophic form of scoliosis, which is characterized by early age at onset and rapid progression. Complicatio… Show more
“…Decreased BMD in both sexes at an early age has been reported in up to 50% of individuals with NF1 [Illes et al, 2001;Kuorilehto et al, 2004b;Lammert et al, 2005;Dulai et al, 2007;Stevenson et al, 2007;Yilmaz et al, 2007;Brunetti-Pierri et al, 2008;Duman et al, 2008]. This may be related to an inadequate increase in bone remodeling observed by both bone histomorphometry and changes in circulating bone markers [Stevenson et al, 2008;Seitz et al, 2009].…”
Section: Osteoporosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased incidence of fractures in patients with NF1 has been reported, but sample sizes were small [Brunetti-Pierri et al, 2008;Tucker et al, 2008]. Another challenge to interpreting low BMD in patients with NF1 correctly is posed by recent reports of low vitamin D (14-21 ng/ml serum 25-dihydroxy-vitamin D, 25-OH-D) and osteomalacia in a subset of patients with NF1 [Lammert et al, 2005;Seitz et al, 2009]. Controlled studies that are adequately powered, normalize calcium homeostasis and consider age, sex, and race/ ethnicity norms, are needed to determine if the apparent high prevalence of low BMD in patients with NF1 predicts increased fracture risk and a need for intervention.…”
“…Decreased BMD in both sexes at an early age has been reported in up to 50% of individuals with NF1 [Illes et al, 2001;Kuorilehto et al, 2004b;Lammert et al, 2005;Dulai et al, 2007;Stevenson et al, 2007;Yilmaz et al, 2007;Brunetti-Pierri et al, 2008;Duman et al, 2008]. This may be related to an inadequate increase in bone remodeling observed by both bone histomorphometry and changes in circulating bone markers [Stevenson et al, 2008;Seitz et al, 2009].…”
Section: Osteoporosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increased incidence of fractures in patients with NF1 has been reported, but sample sizes were small [Brunetti-Pierri et al, 2008;Tucker et al, 2008]. Another challenge to interpreting low BMD in patients with NF1 correctly is posed by recent reports of low vitamin D (14-21 ng/ml serum 25-dihydroxy-vitamin D, 25-OH-D) and osteomalacia in a subset of patients with NF1 [Lammert et al, 2005;Seitz et al, 2009]. Controlled studies that are adequately powered, normalize calcium homeostasis and consider age, sex, and race/ ethnicity norms, are needed to determine if the apparent high prevalence of low BMD in patients with NF1 predicts increased fracture risk and a need for intervention.…”
“…We find significant and robust changes in the nasal region of Nf1ob-/-mice. This pattern of deformed frontal midface region of the skull in Nf1ob-/-mice parallels the quantitative changes in the analogous structures in human NF1 craniofacial skeleton resulting in unilateral proptosis of an eye and facial asymmetry [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. NF1 patients often exhibit macrocephaly.…”
Section: Bmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In rare cases plexiform Neurofibromas have been reported to be associated with impacted teeth and deformed alveolar ridge while optic nerve gliomas have been associated with orbit defects [12][13][14][15]. NF1 patients may also display generalized defects in bone metabolism and bone turnover, resulting in osteoporosis in up to one half of affected individuals [16,17]. Recently a neurofibromin osteoblast conditional knockout mouse was developed to study the skeletal manifestations of NF1.…”
Sphenoid wing dysplasia (SWD), which results in a craniofacial deformity, is the third most common skeletal deformity in Neurofibromatosis Type I (NF1) patients. A neurofibromin osteoblast conditional deletion mouse model (Nf1ob-/-) has been developed to study the skeletal abnormalities in NF1. No overt morphological phenotype is seen in the appendicular or axial skeleton of these mice. Nf1ob-/-mice have been shown to have increased bone porosity and lower bone density. We noted a progressive craniofacial deformity, which results in cranial asymmetry, malocclusion and unilateral proptosis of an eye. To assess this deformity, we employed micro-computed tomography (µCT) and geometric morphometric analysis to compare Nf1ob-/-mouse skulls to control animals. Landmarks were placed on the images at 13 biologically relevant cranial anatomical sites. Analysis of distances and angles between these landmarks revealed that there is significant variation between the Nf1ob-/-mice and controls. We found that the nasal and frontal bones of Nf1ob-/-mice skulls are deviated from the central line, whereas it was straight in controls. The nasal region is tipped downward in Nf1ob-/-mice. We also noted that the cranium shows a trend toward macrocephaly in Nf1ob-/-mice whereas other measurements were within the range of normal control mice. These differences correspond to those seen in craniofacial dysplasia and SWD in NF1 patients. No tumors were found associated with the craniofacial dysplasia in Nf1ob-/-mice. Our results identify a primarily osteoblast origin for the pathogenesis of craniofacial dysplasia in Nf1ob-/-mice and strongly support an osteoblast origin for SWD in NF1. In addition, we identify and validate a novel mouse model with which to explore molecular mechanisms and test preventative treatments for SWD in NF1.
“…There is increasing evidence from animal models and human data that the heterozygous NF1 state can cause generalized bone abnormalities such as osteopenia [Kuorilehto et al, 2004;Lammert et al, 2005;Stevenson et al, 2007;Brunetti-Pierri et al, 2008]. Other skeletal complications occur with a great deal of variability of expression; some such as tibial dysplasia/pseudarthrosis occur very rarely, with an incidence of only 3-5% of NF1 patients.…”
Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a common autosomal dominant disorder with high penetrance but extreme variability of expression. Monozygotic (MZ) twins with NF1 who have phenotypic discordances are a useful tool in evaluating which traits are influenced by non-hereditary influences such as second hit somatic events, environmental agents, epigenetic modification, or post-zygotic mutations. We evaluated nine sets of MZ twins and one set of MZ triplets, ages 4-18 years, for NF1 features and calculated probandwise concordance (P C ) for each feature. MZ twins were highly concordant in numbers of cafe-au-lait spots (P C ¼ 0.89) and cutaneous neurofibromas. IQ scores were within 10 points for all twin pairs tested, and similar patterns of learning disabilities and speech disorders were observed. Twin pairs showed significant discordance for tumors, particularly plexiform neurofibromas (P C ¼ 0.40) and malignant peripheral nerves sheath tumors (MPNST), as expected if post-natal second -hit events were contributing to these features. One set of twins was concordant for multiple, large paraspinal neurofibromas, suggesting that there may be more hereditary factors involved in production of paraspinal neurofibromas. Four sets were concordant for pectus deformities of the chest (P C ¼ 0.80). Three sets of twins were discordant for scoliosis (P C ¼ 0.40); an additional set was concordant for scoliosis but differed in presence of dystrophic features and need for surgery. Our data suggest there are additional non-hereditary factors modifying the NF1 phenotype and causing discordancies between MZ twins. Future studies may focus on differences in epigenetic changes or somatic mosaicism which have been documented for other disease genes in MZ twins.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.