Decrease of rice plant resistance and induction of hormesis and carboxylesterase titre in brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) by xenobiotics

Nanthakumar, M.; Lakshmi, V. Jhansi; Bhushan, Vemuri Shashi; Balachandran, S. M.; Mohan, M.

doi:10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.12.006

Cited by 19 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Deltamethrin could enhance the carboxylesterse activity of N. lugens by stimulating physiological system. Higher carboxylesterase activity was also found in organophosphorus insecticides resistant N. lugens (Hama and Hosoda, ; Nanthakumar et al., ). In laboratory selected N. lugens , the variation of esterase activity was highly related with methamidophos resistance (Liu et al., ; Liu et al., ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

PHYSIOLOGICAL EFECTS OF PAICHONGDING APPLIED TO RICE ON THE Nilaparvata lugens (STÅ L), THE BROWN PLANTHOPPER

Qin

Zhang

et al. 2014

Arch Insect Biochem Physiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) is a major rice pest in Asia. Paichongding is a novel neonicotinoid insecticide developed in 2008. The effects of this insecticide on the activity of detoxification enzymes of N. lugens and on rice resistance to the pest were examined in the laboratory. The results showed that paichongding could significantly decrease the acetylcholinesterase and GSHs transferase activities of N. lugens. The variation tendency of mixed function oxidase (MFO) activity was similar with that of the esterase. After 12 h treatment, there was no significance between the treatment and control. However, the activities of MFO and esterase increased after 24 and 48 h treatment, which suggested that MFO and esterase may play an important role in the detoxification of paichongding for N. lugens. Our results also demonstrated that treated with paichongding, damage levels of rice plants were significantly lower than those of control plants except 15 days after treatment. Compared with the control, injury indices decreased 70.22, 49.12, 34.44, and 23.23% at 3 , 6 , 9, and 12 days after paichongding treatment, respectively. The laboratory results suggested that paichongding may be effective for the control of brown planthopper.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 90%

PHYSIOLOGICAL EFECTS OF PAICHONGDING APPLIED TO RICE ON THE Nilaparvata lugens (STÅ L), THE BROWN PLANTHOPPER

Qin

Zhang

et al. 2014

Arch Insect Biochem Physiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In rice systems, non-chemical technologies are well-advanced for insect pest management (Hong-xing et al 2017 ). For rice brown planthopper, in addition to host plant resistance, adequate nutrient or irrigation management and conservation biological control (e.g.,(Gurr et al 2016 , Hemerik et al 2018 ), particular fungicides interfere with pest development and can be included in IPM packages (Nanthakumar et al 2012 ; Shentu et al 2016 ). For each of the above pests, IPM packages are at different stages of development—ranging from scientific evaluation, farm-level validation and adaptation, to grower adoption.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considered a “Green Revolution” pest, rice planthoppers first gained prominence in tropical Asia during the 1960s and 1970s when high-yielding rice varieties were actively promoted together with synthetic pesticides (Bottrell and Schoenly 2012 ; Escalada and Heong 2004 ). Brown planthopper outbreaks are due to the insecticide-induced mortality of natural enemies and an ensuing loss of regulating ecosystem services (Horgan and Crisol 2013 ; Bottrell and Schoenly 2012 ; Horgan 2018 ; Spangenberg et al 2015 ) plus the widespread development of brown planthopper resistance to insecticides, including neonicotinids (Zhang et al 2016 ; Min et al 2014 ; Basanth et al 2013 ; Puinean et al 2010 ; Hadi et al 2015 ; Matsumura et al 2008 ) and insecticide-induced hormesis in which insecticide treatments enhance brown planthopper survival, development and reproduction (Yin et al 2014 ; Nanthakumar et al 2012 ; Horgan 2018 ; Zhu et al 2004 ; Azzam et al 2009 ; Azzam et al 2011 ). Though brown planthopper-resistant rice varieties have been developed, widespread adaptation to resistance genes has compromised their effectiveness and insecticide applications thus remain the mainstay of Asian rice farmers (Spangenberg et al 2015 ; Horgan 2018 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic pesticides. Part 4: Alternatives in major cropping systems

Veres

Wyckhuys

Kiss

et al. 2020

Environ Sci Pollut Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present a synthetic review and expert consultation that assesses the actual risks posed by arthropod pests in four major crops, identifies targets for integrated pest management (IPM) in terms of cultivated land needing pest control and gauges the implementation “readiness” of non-chemical alternatives. Our assessment focuses on the world’s primary target pests for neonicotinoid-based management: western corn rootworm (WCR, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera ) in maize; wireworms ( Agriotes spp.) in maize and winter wheat; bird cherry-oat aphid ( Rhopalosiphum padi ) in winter wheat; brown planthopper (BPH, Nilaparvata lugens ) in rice; cotton aphid ( Aphis gossypii ) and silver-leaf whitefly (SLW, Bemisia tabaci ) in cotton. First, we queried scientific literature databases and consulted experts from different countries in Europe, North America, and Asia about available IPM tools for each crop-pest system. Next, using an online survey, we quantitatively assessed the economic relevance of target pests by compiling country-level records of crop damage, yield impacts, extent of insecticide usage, and “readiness” status of various pest management alternatives (i.e., research, plot-scale validation, grower-uptake). Biological control received considerable scientific attention, while agronomic strategies (e.g., crop rotation), insurance schemes, decision support systems (DSS), and innovative pesticide application modes were listed as key alternatives. Our study identifies opportunities to advance applied research, IPM technology validation, and grower education to halt or drastically reduce our over-reliance on systemic insecticides globally. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11356-020-09279-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

“…A CarE gene is induced in A. aegypti larvae by LD 50 doses of five different xenobiotics and insecticides (atrazine, copper, fluoranthene, permethrin, and temephos) after 24 h (Poupardin et al, ). Deltamethrin has the ability to stimulate CarEs in Nilaparvata lugens (Nanthakumar et al, ). Similarly, triazine induced ESTs in Spodoptera frugiperda (Yu, ); CO 2 ‐enriched atmosphere effectively induced CarE in Stegobium paniceum and Lasioderma serricorne (Li et al, ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF TWO CARBOXYLESTERASE GENES OF THE CITRUS RED MITE, Panonychus citri (ACARI: TETRANYCHIDAE)

Zhang

Niu

Ding

et al. 2013

Arch Insect Biochem Physiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The citrus red mite, Panonychus citri, is known for its ability to rapidly evolve resistance to insecticides/acaricides and to adapt to hosts that produce toxins. To get better insight into the detoxification mechanism of P. citri, two carboxylesterase (CarE) genes, PCE1 and PCE2, were isolated and characterized. PCE1 and PCE2 contained open reading frames of 1,653 and 1,392 nucleotides, encoding proteins of 550 and 463 amino acid residues, respectively. Phylogenetic analyses showed that PCE1 and PCE2 were most closely related to the CarE genes from other phytophagous mites. The transcriptional profiles of two CarE genes among developmental stages (egg, larva, nymph, adult female, and adult male), after exposing to four acaricides (avermectin, azocyclotin, pyridaben, and spirodiclofen) and acid rain were investigated using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR). The results showed that during development, PCE1 was highly expressed at the egg stage, whereas PCE2 was abundantly expressed at the adult stage of males. The expression levels of PCE1 were highly induced upon exposure to acaricides and acid rain. On the other hand, the expression levels of PCE2 were increased after treatment with avermectin and pyridaben. These results suggest that PCE1 and PCE2 may have distinct roles in different developmental stages and participate in the detoxification of acaricides.

show abstract

Decrease of rice plant resistance and induction of hormesis and carboxylesterase titre in brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) by xenobiotics

Cited by 19 publications

References 17 publications

PHYSIOLOGICAL EFECTS OF PAICHONGDING APPLIED TO RICE ON THE Nilaparvata lugens (STÅ L), THE BROWN PLANTHOPPER

PHYSIOLOGICAL EFECTS OF PAICHONGDING APPLIED TO RICE ON THE Nilaparvata lugens (STÅ L), THE BROWN PLANTHOPPER

An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic pesticides. Part 4: Alternatives in major cropping systems

MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION OF TWO CARBOXYLESTERASE GENES OF THE CITRUS RED MITE, Panonychus citri (ACARI: TETRANYCHIDAE)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About