Previously, we reported minimal opioid receptor occupancy following a clinical dose of the -opioid agonist, methadone, measured in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET) with [11 C]diprenorphine and subsequently used rats to obtain experimental data in support of a high receptor reserve hypothesis (Melichar et al., 2005). Here, we report on further preclinical studies investigating opioid receptor occupancy with oxycodone (-and -receptor agonist), morphine (-receptor agonist), and buprenorphine (partial agonist at the -receptor and antagonist at the ␦-and -receptors), each given at antinociceptive doses. In vivo binding of [ 11 C]diprenorphine was not significantly reduced after treatment with the full agonists but was reduced by ϳ90% by buprenorphine. In addition, given that [ 11 C]diprenorphine is a non-subtype-specific PET tracer, there was no regional variation that might feasibly be interpreted as due to differences in opioid subtype distribution. The data support minimal competition between the high-efficacy agonists and the non-subtype-selective antagonist radioligand and highlight the limitations of [ 11 C]diprenorphine PET to monitor in vivo occupancy. Alternative means may be needed to address clinical issues regarding opioid receptor occupancy that are required to optimize treatment strategies.Positron emission tomography (PET) with the radioligand, [ 11 C]diprenorphine has been used for over a decade to assess or measure opioid receptor function in human brain. Specific binding of this ligand in vivo can be blocked by the opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone (13 g/kg naloxone resulted in ϳ50% reduction in binding; Melichar et al., 2003) and is locally reduced in conditions expected to result in an increased concentration of endogenous agonist; for example, pain (for review, see Sprenger et al., 2005). We had therefore used PET with [ 11 C]diprenorphine to quantify opioid receptor occupancy in methadone-maintained opiate-dependent patients. Our aim was to address clinical issues in treatment of opioid dependence such as agonist dose-to-outcome, with a view to optimizing treatment strategies but, in the end, found no statistically significant reduction in specific binding compared with control (Melichar et al., 2005). A likely explanation was that clinically relevant doses (18 -90 mg daily) of methadone result in low levels of occupancy of opioid receptors. Other factors considered were receptor trafficking, agonist concentration at the site of action, and, since the predominant form of the opioid receptor in vivo is a low agonist affinity state, the limited ability of agonists to block highaffinity binding of an antagonist radiotracer.