2017
DOI: 10.7202/1039735ar
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Découverte de la cordulie tricoteuse (Somatochlora filosa) au Canada et reconsidération de la cordulie linéaire (Somatochlora linearis) au Québec, deux espèces rhéophiles de libellules

Abstract: La pêche d’une naïade de la cordulie tricoteuse (Odonata : Corduliidae : Somatochlora filosa), le 7 septembre 2016 à Sainte-Catherine-de-Hatley, en Estrie, au Québec, représente une première mention de l’espèce au Canada. Fort méconnu, l’habitat de reproduction de cette espèce est rapporté pour la deuxième fois en Amérique du Nord. La découverte inattendue de cette population relique, isolée de 575 km au nord de son aire de répartition connue, soulève un questionnement sur la composition originelle de l’odonat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Somatochlora linearis. Savard et al (2017) authenticate the occurrence of this species from a teneral female specimen collected in 1877 by Léon Provancher at Saint-Hyacinthe in the region of Montérégie. The species has not been found recently at the Provancher site (which is now heavily disturbed by human activities) and is possibly extirpated from the province of Québec.…”
Section: Québec (17 New Provincial Records)mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Somatochlora linearis. Savard et al (2017) authenticate the occurrence of this species from a teneral female specimen collected in 1877 by Léon Provancher at Saint-Hyacinthe in the region of Montérégie. The species has not been found recently at the Provancher site (which is now heavily disturbed by human activities) and is possibly extirpated from the province of Québec.…”
Section: Québec (17 New Provincial Records)mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In 2020, the list had grown to 219, but this included the three alien species mentioned earlier that were detected in Québec, so the actual number should have been 216. However, Cannings (2019), in his overview of the Canadian fauna, gave the number as 214, having inadvertently missed the record of Somatochlora filosa (Savard et al 2017) and omitting Stylurus plagiatus (see note under "Species Retained in the Canadian List"). The texts and tabular databases (i.e, provincial/territorial species lists, and status ranks for each species) for these reports are available at Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council (2016a, b;2022a, b).…”
Section: Status and Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Landscapes are noted as being ‘forested’ and relatively ‘undisturbed’ with ‘minimal’ agriculture. Surveys of rivers that meet these criteria in states and provinces where O. howei has been found ( Nikula 2002 , White et al 2010 , Hamill 2013 , COSEWIC 2018 ) or where it is presumed they could occur ( Wagner and Thomas 1999 , Klymko 2010 , Olcott 2011 , ODS 2019 , Pfeiffer et al 2019 , Savard 2019 ) have often failed to locate any individuals. This localized and patchy distribution and the apparently narrow habitat requirements has led Ophiogomphus howei to be designated as a habitat specialist ( Kennedy and White 1979 , White et al 2010 , COSEWIC 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The label data associated with the Odonata museum objects were electronically recorded in another FileMaker Pro relational database, each object being given a unique identifier label. The taxonomic nomenclature was updated using recent checklists (Garrison and von Ellenrieder 2016; Paulson and Dunkle 2018; Savard 2018). North American collection geoposition coordinates were found retrospectively using the Canada Geographical Names Database at Natural Resources Canada and the Geographic Names Information System at the United States Geological Survey.…”
Section: Specimen Digitisationmentioning
confidence: 99%