Decoupling phylogenetic and functional diversity to reveal hidden signals in community assembly

Abstract

Summary Functional traits and phylogeny offer different, and often complementary, information about ecological differences between species, an essential step to uncover biodiversity assembly mechanisms and their feedbacks to ecosystem functions. However, traits and phylogeny are often related due to underlying trait evolution. Consequently, when combined, their shared information can be overemphasized, hindering their complementarity. It is therefore desirable to decouple their unique and overlapping contributions. We propose a conceptual and mathematical framework that produces a set of meaningful measures of ecological differences between species. We test the properties of these measures and the validity of the approach with extensive simulated data to show (i) the information provided by decoupling traits from phylogeny and vice versa, and (ii) that decoupling trait and phylogenetic information can uncover otherwise hidden signals underlying species coexistence and turnover. The application of the approach is further illustrated using a large dataset of Central European meadows as a case study. Decoupling traits and phylogeny particularly reveals the importance of differentiation between phylogenetically related species, which can be essential to understand species replacements along environmental gradients and the combined action of environmental filtering and limiting similarity within communities. Decoupling traits and phylogeny provides an avenue for connecting macro‐evolutionary and local factors affecting coexistence and for understanding how complex species differences affect multiple ecosystem functions. We present an R function called ‘decouple’, which allows a simple and wide application of the framework.

Forest community assembly is driven by different strata‐dependent mechanisms along an elevational gradient

“…Phylogeny likely reflects conserved unmeasured traits or complex adaptive strategies not easily captured by discrete trait measures and that interact with the assembly mechanisms (Cadotte et al, ). The theoretical framework posits that if both phylogenetic and functional dispersions were similar, the traits would exhibit a strong phylogenetic signal (de Bello et al, ). Here, the phylogeny and trait diversity for tree species are concordant in our study, which is consistent with our results for the phylogenetic signal of overstorey trees.…”

Trait‐mediated filtering drives contrasting patterns of species richness and functional diversity across montane bird assemblages

“…However, several studies have found a lack of surrogacy across various spatiotemporal scales which challenge us to explain their assembly, because of lack of concordance in different habitat constraints, biotic interactions, dispersal limitation and evolutionary history (Bässler et al, 2016;Purschke et al, 2013). A growing interest to elucidate patterns of species assembly and biodiversity effects on ecosystem services has boosted the development of methods and studies focusing on species' ecological and life-history differences (Bello et al, 2017;McGill, Enquist, Weiher, & Westoby, 2006). In addition, studies of the distributions of species and diversity have re-emerged with new urgency, as species identity alone (e.g.…”

Changes in key traits versus depth and latitude suggest energy‐efficient locomotion, opportunistic feeding and light lead to adaptive morphologies of marine fishes

“…Furthermore, new tools that can incorporate phylogenetic relationships among species into analyses of ecological gradients hold great promise for teasing out phylogenetical signals linked to traits (e.g. de Bello et al, ; Pillar & Duarte, ). Our study has identified variation in several key traits of fishes along broad‐scale depth and latitude gradients, facilitating the development of a more comprehensive understanding of fish ecology and the environmental drivers of morphological adaptations in the deep sea.…”