Decoupling market incumbency from organizational prehistory: Locating the real sources of competitive advantage in R&D for radical innovation

Abstract

The creative destruction literature has argued that differences in R&D performance of incumbent vs. entrant firms can be explained through organizational change theories about established vs. de novo firms. A disconnect exists between these theories and the available empirical evidence because often the best performing firms are established firms as well. I propose to resolve this disconnect by distinguishing between market incumbency (presence in a market prior to a discontinuity) and organizational prehistory (organizational experience prior to a transition, whether between technologies or between markets). Doing so allows me to contrast incumbent vs. entrant and de alio vs. de novo studies, and to suggest more robust future research designs. I illustrate my proposition using qualitative data from the anticancer and AIDS‐treatment drug markets. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Does participation in global value chains extend export duration?

“…Traditionally, first‐mover enterprises participating in GVCs have as their priority to obtain advanced technology and generate excessive profit, so achieving the export competitive advantage in GVCs (Bao & Chen, ; Mathews, ; Suarez & Lanzolla, ; Vecchiato, ), while latecomer enterprises have to face entry barriers erected by first‐mover enterprises. Furthermore, first‐mover enterprises participating in GVCs could forge good relationships with MNCs depending on their “incumbency advantage”, and then obtain effective market information (e.g., product order, product price, and customer profile) in time, reducing trade risk caused by asymmetric information (Alpert & Kamins, ; Lourdes, ; Niedrich & Swain, ).…”

Night markets: entrepreneurship and achieving competitive advantage

“…Ettlie (2000) considered that in the current environment of continuously changing technology, integrating the innovation of management technology has become the key to modern enterprises' building lasting competitiveness. Lourdes (2013) showed that in the era of the knowledge economy, business development and competitive advantage depend more on enterprises' innovation abilities. Competitive advantage depends primarily on business technology and management advantages, and as such, the competition among enterprises is the competition between their innovation abilities, i.e.…”

Machine learning models for early‐stage investment decision making in startups

“…Resource‐based theories point to inadequacies in financial, human, and social capital as handicapping startups from scaling and adapting to challenges (Fern et al, 2012). Organizational ecology studies underscore the significance of strategic choices and competitive positioning in determining mortality rates (Lourdes Sosa, 2012). Behavioral research also indicates biases and heuristics among founders that hamper objective decision making (Casti, 2021; Joseph et al, 2021; Onan, 2023b).…”