1995
DOI: 10.1214/aop/1176988291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupling Inequalities for the Tail Probabilities of Multivariate $U$-Statistics

Abstract: In this paper we present a decoupling inequality that shows that multivariate Ustatistics can be studied as sums of (conditionally) independent random variables. This result has important implications in several areas of probability and statistics including the study random graphs and multiple stochastic integration. More precisely, we get the following result: Theorem 1. Let {X j } be a sequence of independent random variables in a measurable 1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, T ′ n are independent random variables. The decoupling inequality of de la Peña and Montgomery-Smith [2] states that, whenever f i,i = 0 and f i,j = f j,i for all i, j,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, T ′ n are independent random variables. The decoupling inequality of de la Peña and Montgomery-Smith [2] states that, whenever f i,i = 0 and f i,j = f j,i for all i, j,…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper generalizes the notion of incoherence to problems beyond the setting of sparse signal recovery. In [29], the authors studied the nuclear norm heuristic applied to a related problem where partial information about a matrix M is available from m equations of the form 15) where for each k, {A…”
Section: Connections Alternatives and Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 6.5 [15] Let {η i } 1≤i≤n be a sequence of independent random variables, and {x ij } i =j be elements taken from a Banach space. Then…”
Section: Lemma 64mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thanks to general decoupling inequalities for U -statistics [25], which we recall in the "Appendix" (Theorem 7.1), the above theorem is formally equivalent to Theorem 1.1. In fact in [44] Latała first proves the above version.…”
Section: A Concentration Inequality For Non-lipschitz Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%