Decoupling Economic Growth from Embodied Water–Energy–Food Consumption Based on a Modified MRIO Model: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Region in China

Abstract

Water, energy, and food are indispensable resources for socioeconomic development, and are highly interwoven in urban activities. Clarifying spatial differences in resource consumption is of great significance for coordinated management. However, there is still a lack of a unified assessment for water–energy–food (WEF) nexus flow analysis. This study proposes a comprehensive framework to investigate WEF utilization based on a modified multi-regional input–output (MRIO) analysis. Taking the case of the Yangtze River Delta region, we first inventoried embodied water–energy–food consumption from 2012 to 2017. Then, decoupling analysis and the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) method were applied to explore decoupling states and identify driving factors. The results show that overall embodied WEF consumption experienced a downward trend from 2012 to 2017, and different provinces varied significantly. Jiangsu had the largest consumption of water and energy, while Anhui contributed a big chunk to food consumption. The manufacturing sector heavily relied on WEF resources and had a great impact on the ecological environment. The decoupling performance indicated a general trend of weak decoupling and strong decoupling in most provinces, with the mining, electricity, and gas supply sectors contributing most to positive decoupling, and the service sectors devoting the most to negative decoupling. As for resource type, water ecological footprint decoupled more than energy and food ecological footprints. Technology level and industrial structure had a major effect on the realization of decoupling, while economic output and population scale were the main restraining factors. Finally, we provide some differentiated policy recommendations for coordinated resource management.

A Detailed Examination of China’s Clean Energy Mineral Consumption: Footprints, Trends, and Drivers

“…Distinct from LCA and EW-MFA, the uniqueness of footprint analysis lies in its ability to capture comprehensively the environmental impacts of human activities and translate them into intuitive indicators [20]. The initial concept of "ecological footprint" has further evolved [21,22], giving rise to several subdomains such as energy footprint [23], water footprint [24], carbon footprint [25,26], and material footprint [27]. This method has proven its efficacy in calculating overall material resource consumption [28], identifying the characteristics of material flows [29], and analyzing trade shifts [30].…”

Spatiotemporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of Water-Energy-Food-Carbon System Vulnerability: A Case Study of the Yellow River Basin, China

“…Water, energy, and food are fundamental material resources essential for human survival. The water-energy-food nexus was first proposed at the Bonn Conference in 2011 and, since then, scholars have been investigating the internal inter-relationships, as well as the external impacts and interactions, of this nexus system [5][6][7][8][9]. As a vital part of the ecosystem, the carbon system is also closely related to water, energy, and food.…”