2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2940053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupling Control of Maglev Train Based on Feedback Linearization

Abstract: The controlled air-gap of the electromagnetic suspension maglev train is generally 8-10 mm, which makes the effect of the vehicle-track dynamic coupling significant. It is found that the track irregularities especially the track step will make the controlled air-gap of the suspension system fluctuate off the setting air-gap. When the situation is even worse, the suspension gap will fluctuate beyond the limit so that the electromagnet or the supporting slide crashes with the track which results in noise and poo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the aim is to design a linear integral quadratic controller to make the error between the set-point and the current value of the system output to go to zero. Then the extended version of the model is built as (24).…”
Section: Design Of a Linear Control For The Linearized Closed-loop Sy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the aim is to design a linear integral quadratic controller to make the error between the set-point and the current value of the system output to go to zero. Then the extended version of the model is built as (24).…”
Section: Design Of a Linear Control For The Linearized Closed-loop Sy...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution had positive results, but the authors did not consider the actual effects of the track irregularities during real-time operation of the suspension module, which has a significant impact on the nonlinear behavior of the system. A solution to solve the fluctuations of the suspension system when a magnetic levitation system passes at low speed over a track step was proposed [24]. The authors developed a feedback linearization controller based on a decoupling technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [27] proposed a PNP control strategy to suppress the deviation range of the levitation gap under the excitation of guideway irregularity. Leng et al [28] used the feedback linearization method to solve the problem described in [26]. Besides, Zhou et al [29] and Li et al [30] proposed a scheme to move the sensor position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this basis, the levitation controller controls the output current of the chopper according to the levitation gap data, so that the electromagnetic attraction generated by the suspension electromagnetic coils can ensure that the levitation gap is within a preset range [8,9]. LCMs fulfill basic requirements for maintaining the expected levitation gap against disturbances from the train body vibration and track unevenness during train operation through the use of advanced control strategies [10][11][12][13], which results in a complex levitation control system with coupling interaction. On top of these hardware subsystems, an effective online condition monitoring (CM) system enables realtime levitation condition awareness of the maglev train.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%