2021
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2020.3030922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupling Between Extremely Closely Spaced Patch Antennas by Mode Cancellation Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, the reported works on decoupling require making a trade-off between polarizations, radiation patterns, and radiating apertures, that is, compromising one degree of freedom to reduce the decoupling difficulty, which implies that the radiation properties or sizes of the MPAs have inevitably deteriorated. As seen, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] mainly concentrate on the decoupling between the two-patch array, each port works with two radiating apertures of its respective patch (i.e., as port 1 is excited, the patch 1 works and the patch 2 is isolated, and vice versa when port 2 is excited), which leads to a larger overall size of antennas and a higher profile. Although the antenna in ref.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Obviously, the reported works on decoupling require making a trade-off between polarizations, radiation patterns, and radiating apertures, that is, compromising one degree of freedom to reduce the decoupling difficulty, which implies that the radiation properties or sizes of the MPAs have inevitably deteriorated. As seen, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] mainly concentrate on the decoupling between the two-patch array, each port works with two radiating apertures of its respective patch (i.e., as port 1 is excited, the patch 1 works and the patch 2 is isolated, and vice versa when port 2 is excited), which leads to a larger overall size of antennas and a higher profile. Although the antenna in ref.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 Besides, decoupling can also be realized by placing the coupled antenna element or port at the near-field nulls of the operating element, which could be naturally available 31,32 or obtained by constructing. 33 However, multipatch antennas with decoupling structures usually suffer from an oversized and high profile compared to multiports single patch antennas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complex DGS is proposed in Saurabh and Meshram 21 achieve significant isolation between rhombus‐shaped patch antennas for a sub 6 GHz frequency band, which is not suitable for compact devices. In Sun et al, 22 a relatively simple inductance‐based isolation technique is proposed that achieves about 15 dB isolation between extremely close square patch antennas, however, patch antennas are fed directly with the coaxial probe, which is not considered compatible for thicker substrates and larger arrays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many efforts have been made to achieve higher isolation between two closely spaced antenna elements [18][19][20][21][22] ; however, most of the works presented multilayer structures with DGS and vias, which increases design and fabrication complexity. In Sun and Cao, 18 six parallel passive metallic strips are used to achieve higher isolation of 42 dB between two square patch antennas, however, its design technique is a little complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, mutual interference among the antenna elements must be considered, and decoupling becomes necessary for their proper operation [1]- [3]. Most of previous studies on this subject have focused on in-band decoupling to improve the isolation between the antenna ports [4]- [6]. However, cross-band decoupling is also relevant, since the coupling from cross bands causes undesired effects, such as radiation-pattern distortion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%