2022
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2021.3115049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupled Predictive Current Control With Duty-Cycle Optimization of a Grid-Tied Nine-Switch Converter Applied to an Induction Generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In doing so, controller's computational burden was reduced and need for weighting factor estimation was eliminated. A similar approach using PCC-D with duty cycle optimization for NSDO converter was reported in [30]. Note that the PCC-D neglected 12 active voltage vector pairs and always forced null vector to either of the output ports during the operation.…”
Section: Primary Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, controller's computational burden was reduced and need for weighting factor estimation was eliminated. A similar approach using PCC-D with duty cycle optimization for NSDO converter was reported in [30]. Note that the PCC-D neglected 12 active voltage vector pairs and always forced null vector to either of the output ports during the operation.…”
Section: Primary Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the problem of significant current ripple, some scholars have proposed a duty cycle MPC (DCMPC) method that uses a duty cycle of one effective vector and one zero vector within a control cycle [12][13][14]. Instead of using only a zero vector as the second voltage vector, a generalized double vectors MPC (DMPC) technique is proposed, where the selection of the second vector is not fixed as a zero vector but includes the other six vectors apart from the first effective vector [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FCS-MPC identifies the optimum converter switching signals by minimizing the cost function every sampling period; thereby regulating the grid currents to their desired references. The FCS-MPC implementation for a NSDO converter interfacing grid and squirrel cage induction generator through its output ports is reported in [80]. Separate cost function based on current error for each output port is minimized sequentially to have an independent control of the grid and generator.…”
Section: Finite Control Set Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the ESD current and FC voltage are the control objectives, a cost function based on ESD current error and FC voltage error with pre-defined weighting factor is considered. However, the current references for FCS-MPC in [77][78][79][80][81] is generated by a voltage control loop (outer loop) based on a traditional PI controller. As discussed previously, the design of the gain parameters for the voltage control loop is challenging as the converter with FCS-MPC operates at a variable frequency.…”
Section: Finite Control Set Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%