2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2003.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decoupled elastic prestack depth migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we will focus on finite difference applications of the first‐order approximation to the Eikonal equation, and more specifically on the algorithm time3d by Podvin & Lecomte (1991). Ever since the publication of time3d , it has remained extensively used which is exemplified here in a few recent publications ranging over local earthquake tomographic studies (Kim et al 2005), converted seismic wave applications (Latorre et al 2004), pre‐stack depth migration (Druzhinin 2003), fat‐ray tomography (Husen & Kissling 2001), and for deriving starting models for full waveform inversion (Operto et al 2004). One of the reasons for its popularity is mainly its reliability and robustness in the presence of large velocity contrasts (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we will focus on finite difference applications of the first‐order approximation to the Eikonal equation, and more specifically on the algorithm time3d by Podvin & Lecomte (1991). Ever since the publication of time3d , it has remained extensively used which is exemplified here in a few recent publications ranging over local earthquake tomographic studies (Kim et al 2005), converted seismic wave applications (Latorre et al 2004), pre‐stack depth migration (Druzhinin 2003), fat‐ray tomography (Husen & Kissling 2001), and for deriving starting models for full waveform inversion (Operto et al 2004). One of the reasons for its popularity is mainly its reliability and robustness in the presence of large velocity contrasts (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter was then used in PreSDM of the surface seismic data from various lines (Figure 13). Each line was migrated several times, using the full-wave decoupled PreSDM formula (Druzhinin, 2003) that honors elastic imaging conditions and minimizes cross-talk between various wave types. Input data were preprocessed shot gathers after GRT wavefield separation.…”
Section: Imaging Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is proving to be a major problem for seismic imaging in the North Atlantic margin, from Norway to Ireland. The purpose of this case study is to demonstrate that full-wave decoupled imaging (Druzhinin, 2003) combined with the special data preprocessing sequence (Druzhinin et al, 2004) may be promising for delineating complex basalt lava flows and identifying weak sub-basalt reflections. To minimize velocity uncertainties, the calibrated logs, seismic data and non-seismic measurements such as high-resolution gravity data should be processed together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GDRT is a discrete version of the Generalized Radon Transform (GRT) (Beylkin, 1982) that extends conventional linear or parabolic slant-stack data transformations used in seismic processing (Yilmaz, 2001). To obtain a good seismic image along the 2D profile, we have applied the GDRT PSDM workflow (Droujinine, 2003) aimed at effectively removing strong superfluous events (coherent noise) while enhancing weak valuable events, especially in the low frequency components of the data. Table 2 contains a list of principal events (both signal and noise) to be enhanced, migrated or attenuated.…”
Section: [ 2 Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%