2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.105.045107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconvolving the components of the sign problem

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the case displayed in Fig. 1, and also explains why the minimum of sign can be a criterion judging the phase transition in Ref [34].…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is similar to the case displayed in Fig. 1, and also explains why the minimum of sign can be a criterion judging the phase transition in Ref [34].…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Or more strictly speaking, those positive examples where the average sign can probe the critical value can be excep- tional cases. On the other hand, in previous studies, the phase transition can be related to the sign value itself or its derivative in different circumstances without an explicit criterion [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. This non-conformity has also been discussed in the present work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…But Recent developments have changed this viewpoint, there are cases in Hubbard model at certain filling the average sign is not exponential decay [61,62] and we have found that it is possible to prove the average sign of quantum many-body lattice models accquire algebraic sign structure [32,33], if their finite size partition functions satisfy the Sign bound theory. The details on the theory and its application on the systems with extended or long-range interaction such as the extended Hubbard [32,63] and quantum Moiré lattice models [64,65,66,30,67,33,68], are given in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…At the same time, there are also proposals that the negative sign of a configuration is a topological invariant, which is an imaginary time counterpart of the Aharonov-Anandan phase and can be reduced to a Berry phase in the adiabatic limit [12]. And the sign problem has even been linked to quantum phase transitions [13,14]. Moreover, it was shown recently that some interacting models may have intrinsic sign problem, which cannot be cured [15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps most notably, DQMC has enabled the study of electron-electron interactions in the repulsive Hubbard model, where Mott insulator physics, magnetic order, unconventional superconductivity, and various additional correlation effects have been observed [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. The sign problem, however, has severely limited our ability to simulate systems absent particle-hole or other symmetries, giving rise to an effective computational cost that scales exponentially with system size and inverse temperature [11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%