1979
DOI: 10.1021/j100473a019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconvolution of fluorescence decay curves. A critical comparison of techniques

Abstract: 13) Note the value reported in ref 14 was not corrected for the error reported by Allendoerfer (ref 15). All other g values reported therein were so corrected.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
132
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
132
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have measured the temporal decay of several samples at cryogenic and room temperature over a broad range of detection energies comprising the QW ground-state transition and the CHC luminescence. All decays are mono-exponential 23 and the corresponding decay times that result from a deconvolution with the instrument response function 24 are plotted in Fig. 4 (red squares) as a function of detection energy.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have measured the temporal decay of several samples at cryogenic and room temperature over a broad range of detection energies comprising the QW ground-state transition and the CHC luminescence. All decays are mono-exponential 23 and the corresponding decay times that result from a deconvolution with the instrument response function 24 are plotted in Fig. 4 (red squares) as a function of detection energy.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this latter case, the small curvature in the SternVolmer plot would probably be caused by the occurrence of multiple conformations in solution. Furthermore, the influence of aspartic residues in close proximity to tryptophan 79 within the 5-167 actin fragment must also be taken into account (47). The CD spectrum shown in Fig.…”
Section: Involvement Of Actin Subdomain 1 In the Interaction Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the parameters in equation 2 and the time difference between the experimental and simulated fluorescence decay curves, ∆t, were determined using a nonlinear, least-squares iterative convolution method based on the Marquardt algorithm [8,9]. Scattered light of a laser pulse is used as L(t).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%