1991
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(91)85149-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deconvolution method for accurate determination of overlapping peak areas in chromatograms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These separations could in principle be separated by deconvolution - e.g. fitting summed Gaussian functions to the data and solving for 3 n parameters (position, width and height) for each peak, where n is the number of separations and must be small [37]. However, unless the number n of separations is known, the complex dependence on the SNR of FLIP-derived distributions makes their resolution by deconvolution challenging - as it depends on numerous assumptions and requires numerous parameters to be determined and adjusted empirically for each data set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These separations could in principle be separated by deconvolution - e.g. fitting summed Gaussian functions to the data and solving for 3 n parameters (position, width and height) for each peak, where n is the number of separations and must be small [37]. However, unless the number n of separations is known, the complex dependence on the SNR of FLIP-derived distributions makes their resolution by deconvolution challenging - as it depends on numerous assumptions and requires numerous parameters to be determined and adjusted empirically for each data set.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%